Showing posts with label S. Sanders. Show all posts
Showing posts with label S. Sanders. Show all posts

Monday, March 25, 2019

What did Donald Trump do today?

He threatened FBI agents with death, if his own press secretary is to be believed.

Trump's press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said this today:

They are literally — the media and the Democrats — have called the president an agent of a foreign government. That is an accusation equal to treason, which is punishable by death in this country.

It's possible to read this as Sanders saying that the accusations themselves are "equal to treason." But in context it seems more likely that she was simply saying that anyone who wanted Trump investigated for his known and previously unknown ties to Russia was trying to have him put to death. Sanders didn't say which "media" or "Democrats" she thought were calling for Trump's death.

This is factually and legally absurd, as Sanders presumably knew. While Trump personally may now escape prosecution for his Russia connections, he was never in danger of being charged with the capital crime of treason, which has a specific definition that wouldn't apply even if he had been caught red-handed conspiring (secretly or in the open) with Russia's efforts to sabotage the 2016 election.

But Sanders' comments must also be viewed in light of Trump's own use of the word "treason" today: to describe the fact that anyone dared to investigated him in the first place. He invoked that capital crime in describing his plans for revenge to reporters shortly after Sanders spoke:

We can never let this happen to another president again. There are a lot of people out there that have done some very evil things, very bad things, I would say treasonous things against our country. Those people will certainly be looked at. I’ve been looking at them for a long time. And I’m saying, why haven’t they been looked at? They lied to Congress. Many of them you know who they are.
Like Sanders, Trump didn't say who he meant specifically would be "looked at" on his order—but today his campaign sent out a memo to TV networks naming Democrats that Trump wants revenge on for their supposed "lies." None of quotes attributed to the figures named were untrue.

Who cares?

  • It is not treason to investigate crimes.
  • It is not treason to oppose the president.
  • It's bad for a president to threaten the media (and unnecessary if he's innocent).

Friday, January 25, 2019

What did Donald Trump do today?

He said that Roger Stone had nothing to do with him.

Trump's longtime friend and 2016 campaign advisor Roger Stone was arrested today on charges that he lied to Congress about what he knew about the Russian campaign to get Trump elected. He also faces charges of witness tampering for threatening another person whose testimony contradicted his own.

Trump insisted, via his lawyer Rudy Giuliani and White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, that Stone's arrest for trying to throw the Mueller probe off the scent of how Russia helped Trump get elected had nothing to do with Trump personally. Specifically, Sanders said that Stone's arrest for what appears to be the cover-up of the crimes committed by Russia and others to help Trump get elected had "nothing to do with the president, and certainly nothing to do with the White House." She added, "This is something that has to do solely with that individual, not something that affects us in this building."

It's true that Stone's indictment does not directly accuse Trump of being a co-conspirator in a crime—unlike, for example, Michael Cohen's sentencing memo. But it does say that Stone's involvement with Wikileaks (the organization that published e-mails stolen by Russian hackers from the DNC intended to embarrass Hillary Clinton) was on the orders of someone at the very top of the campaign:
After the July 22, 2016 release of stolen DNC emails by [WikiLeaks], a senior Trump Campaign official was directed to contact STONE about any additional releases and what other damaging information [WikiLeaks] had regarding the Clinton Campaign. STONE thereafter told the Trump Campaign about potential future releases of damaging material by [WikiLeaks].
The "senior Trump Campaign official" is almost certainly Steve Bannon. If it wasn't Trump himself who ordered Bannon to work with Stone to make sure that the Trump Campaign was in the loop about further Russian attacks on the election, it's not clear who was.

Trump insists he is innocent of any wrongdoing with respect to the election, and so he has denied any responsibility for all of the other Trump Campaign officials who have been indicted or convicted for crimes related to their secret dealings with Russian agents trying to subvert the election. These are: Paul Manafort (campaign chair), Rick Gates (deputy campaign chair), Michael Flynn (senior advisor and Trump's first National Security Advisor), and George Papadopoulos (foreign policy advisor).

Essentially, Trump's argument now seems to be that even if virtually everybody in his campaign was actively working with Russia—sharing secret voter-targeting data, enthusiastically taking meetings about "dirt" on Hillary Clinton, changing the GOP platform to a softer stance on Russia's occupation of Crimea, and so forth—no proof has emerged that Trump himself actively participated.

Why should I care about this?

  • This is incredibly damning even if Trump somehow didn't notice the massive criminal conspiracy between almost every senior official in his campaign and the hostile foreign power he begged on live TV to attack the election he won.

Tuesday, August 14, 2018

What did Donald Trump do today?

He refused to guarantee that there wasn't a recording of him using the n-word.

Trump's hostile views towards African-Americans over the years have been exhaustively documented. He's even helped spawn a resurgence of white supremacist movements in the United States, fueled by his refusal to condemn racial hatred--or, when pushed, to say that there are good and bad people on "both sides" of racism. 

Former reality TV star and director of communications for the White House Office of Public Liaison Omarosa Manigault-Newman has said she has heard Trump using a racial slur on tape, and released a recording of her own in which other Trump administration officials discuss such an incident. Last night, in what appeared to have been his best effort to get ahead of the story, Trump claimed that he'd been offered assurance by the executive producer of The Apprentice that no footage existed in which he said the word. (As many people pointed out, saying a TV show has no recording of him using the word is a little less definitive than saying he doesn't use the word.)

At her briefing today, Sarah Huckabee Sanders had this exchange with NBC News reporter Kristen Welker:
Q Sarah, have you asked the President if he’s ever used the N-word? 
MS. SANDERS: The President addressed that question directly via Twitter. I would refer you back to him. I can certainly say I’ve never heard him use that term or anything similar. 
Q But have you — have you asked him directly, Sarah? 
MS. SANDERS: The President — I didn’t have to, because he addressed it to the American people all at one time. 
Q You haven’t asked him? Why haven’t you asked him directly? 
MS. SANDERS: Again, the President answered that question directly on Twitter earlier today. 
Q Can you stand at the podium and guarantee the American people will never hear Donald Trump utter the N-word on a recording in any context? 
MS. SANDERS: I can’t guarantee anything.
Trump, who rose to political prominence by pretending to believe that President Obama was born in Africa, and who called for the so-called "Central Park Five" to be sent back to prison after they had been cleared by DNA evidence of the rape they were accused of, and whose first appearance in the public eye was as the defendant in a housing discrimination case, and who enthusiastically called out a lone black attendee at a rally as "my African-American over here," and who called a few majority-black nations "shithole countries," and who said that Haitian immigrants "all have AIDS" and that Nigerian immigrants "won't want to go back to their huts," and who makes a point of calling his black critics stupid, and who seems to think that all African-Americans know one another, and who has had no senior African-American advisors as president except for the one he called a "dog" and a "wacky lowlife" today, and who is enthusiastically praised by white supremacy groups that were militantly anti-government before Trump took office, says that Omarosa is lying.

Why is this a bad thing?

  • The press secretary for the president of the United States should be able to guarantee that the president didn't use vile racial slurs on camera.
  • It's bad if Donald Trump used the n-word, but it's much, much worse that nobody would really be surprised by it.

Friday, May 11, 2018

What did Donald Trump do today?

He said, via a spokesperson, that letting Michael Cohen sell access to him was "the definition of draining the swamp."

Many of the companies that hired Trump's sometime-lawyer, sometime-fixer Michael Cohen for his "insight" into Trump have apologized in the last few days. AT&T's CEO called it "a big mistake." Novartis's CEO echoed the sentiment: "We made a mistake in entering into this engagement."

(The exception is the American front company for Russian oligarch Viktor Vekselberg, Columbus Nova, which has refused to comment except to say that the company is "solely owned and controlled by Americans." This is true in a literal sense--its CEO, Vekselberg's cousin, has dual U.S./Russian citizenship--but its main purpose is as a conduit for the Putin-linked billionaire Vekselberg to do business in the United States.)

At today's press briefing, Sarah Huckabee Sanders was asked about those public apologies, and how it reflected on Trump's promise to "drain the swamp" of moneyed interests buying influence. This exchange followed:
MS. SANDERS: I think that this further proves that the President is not going to be influenced by special interests. This is actually the definition of draining the swamp, something the President talked about repeatedly during the campaign. And for anything beyond that, I would direct you to the President’s outside counsel.

Q: Explain one way this is the definition of draining the swamp. I mean, this is companies paying for information (inaudible). 
MS. SANDERS: I think it’s pretty clear that the Department of Justice opposed the [AT& T/Time Warner] merger, and so certainly the President has not been influenced by any — or his administration influenced by any outside special interests.
Essentially, Trump is claiming (via Sanders) that because at least one of the companies seeking to buy influence with him failed to get one thing they might have wanted, it wasn't wrong to allow Cohen to sell access to him.

Sanders didn't comment on whether influence-peddling would be wrong if, for example, Trump's policies favored the pharmaceutical industry, or he showed extreme reluctance to impose legally mandated sanctions on Russians like Vekselberg.

Why should I care about this?

  • The president's time, attention, and goodwill should not be for sale.
  • Corruption is bad even if the corrupters don't get everything they want.
  • A president who actually had a problem with billionaires and corporations buying and selling government would probably have said something by now.

Tuesday, December 5, 2017

What did Donald Trump do today?

He denied that his administration was considering organizing a private army of spies to fight his political enemies... then began walking back the denial.

This morning, The Intercept reported a seemingly preposterous story: that Trump was entertaining a pitch by Erik Prince to develop a "global, private spy network that would circumvent official U.S. intelligence agencies... as a means of countering 'deep state' enemies." The network would be paid for by private donors. Prince is the CEO of the mercenary outfit formerly known as Blackwater, and the brother of Education Secretary Betsy DeVos. He is also the person who set up a secret backchannel between Trump and representatives of the Putin regime before Trump took office. And in a bizarre but poetic touch, the plans supposedly involved contributions from Oliver North, who certainly has experience operating outside the laws of the United States on the secret orders of a president.

Individual elements of the story made a kind of sense. Trump literally compared the US intelligence community to Nazis during his presidential transition, and the relationship hasn't gotten much better since. And during his days as a private citizen, Trump's fondness for hiring platoons of private investigators (and dabbling in amateur surveillance himself) was well established. But at bottom, the story as reported would have a public official being given a private army to deploy against his own government, something that would be cartoonish even by the standards of the Trump administration.

Unsurprisingly, the Trump administration categorically rejected it: "“The White House does not and would not support such a proposal,” said a spokesperson for the National Security Council.

But today, during a press briefing, Sarah Huckabee Sanders dialed back the rejection to what amounts to a "no comment:"
MS. SANDERS: I'm not aware of any plans for something of that definition or anything similar to that at this time.

Q The President would be opposed to that?

MS. SANDERS: I haven’t had that conversation with him.
And shortly after that, a Trump administration official admitted on background that the plan existed and had been discussed.

Why is this a problem?

  • A president who doesn't have faith in his own government cannot fulfill the duties of his office.
  • It's bad if anyone, much less a president, tries to subvert the government of the United States.
  • Surrounding yourself with a personal guard loyal only to you is what authoritarians do.

Wednesday, November 29, 2017

What did Donald Trump do today?

He infuriated two allied governments, gave a boost to the movement behind the assassination of a British member of Parliament, and gave an al-Qaeda recruitment video unprecedented viewership--all in the same retweet.

The events of the day began between 6:30 and 6:50 A.M., when Trump's morning Twitter rant included three retweets of videos posted by one of the leaders of "Britain First," an ultra-nationalist movement at the fringes of British politics. Another of their followers murdered British MP Jo Cox last year over her stance on immigration policies. The videos depicted supposed atrocities committed by Muslims.

One video, titled "Muslim migrant beats up Dutch boy on crutches!", was immediately revealed to be a lie. The perpetrator was neither a Muslim nor a migrant to the Netherlands; he was a native-born Dutch citizen who was arrested and prosecuted as a minor. (The government of the Netherlands put out a statement pointedly reminding Trump, personally, that "facts do matter.")

Another was labeled "Islamist mob pushes a teenage boy off roof and beats him to death!" The action took place during what amounted to a civil war in Egypt between the military and supporters of the ousted Morsi government. The perpetrators were arrested and convicted for the killing.

The third was described as "Muslim Destroys a Statue of Virgin Mary!" This is accurate. It is also recruiting propaganda made by an al-Qaeda affiliate in Syria, which is now receiving worldwide attention thanks to Trump's amplification of it.

Trump almost certainly had no idea what he was retweeting, or what the consequences would be, or who Britain First is. As with all propaganda, its only purpose is to deceive by telling people fictional versions of what they want to hear, and Trump--who still claims to have witnessed firsthand nonexistent celebrations in the streets by New Jersey Muslims on September 11th, and may actually believe it at this point--is an astonishingly easy target for such things.

Confronted by reporters about the lies Trump had unknowingly retweeted, Sarah Huckabee Sanders would only say that the video of one non-Muslim Dutch native assaulting another brought attention to "threats" by Muslim migrants that are "real no matter how you look at it." 

What's the problem here?

  • A president who is so careless that he accidentally directs worldwide attention to al-Qaeda propaganda is unfit for office.
  • A president who first promotes the group behind the murder of an allied country's legislator, and then angrily pushes back when that country's government complains, is a disgrace.
  • It's increasingly difficult to believe that Trump has any control over his impulses.

Sunday, November 26, 2017

Sunday Week in Review

What else did Donald Trump do this week?

Thankfulness. On the Tuesday before Thanksgiving, press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders instituted a rule: before reporters could ask her a question, they had to say what they were thankful for. For the most part, the press corps played along, although ABC correspondent Cecilia Vega's pointed response, "the First Amendment," got a few appreciative hoots.

On Thanksgiving Day, Bloomberg reporter Margaret Talev attempted to ask Trump what he was thankful for. According to the press pool report, Talev "was then reprimanded by a member of the communications staff."

Self-promotion. Trump spent part of Thanksgiving Day with members of the Coast Guard, and he used that occasion, as well as a satellite broadcast to other military units worldwide, to salute what he saw as the source of the military's accomplishments: himself. Much of his speeches focused on how much better a job he regards himself doing than President Obama. Among his comments:

"We know how to win, but we have to let you win. You weren't winning before. They were letting you play even. We want to let you win.

"It's nice that you're working for something that's really starting to work."

"We're very very proud of you. Everybody in this country is watching and they are seeing positive reports for a change. Instead of the neutral and negative reports."

"They say we've made more progress against ISIS than they did in years of the previous administration, and that's because I'm letting you do your job."
As usual, Trump did not specify who "they" were. The main difference between Obama's and Trump's administration of the armed forces has been that Trump has essentially opted out of the actual job of the president, which is to act as the commander-in-chief. Instead, he has turned day-to-day control over operations to the Department of Defense, which allows him to shift blame to military commanders when things go wrong.


401(k)s. Trump packed a whole lot of confusion and deception into one sentence in particular of his Coast Guard address when he told his audience of servicemembers: "Your whole, long life, the stock market is higher than it's ever been. And that means your 401(k), all of the things that you have, whether it's -- even if you're in the military, you have a country that's really starting to turn."

One report says that Trump was pointing at a small child--perhaps one about nine years old, in which case his point about the stock market having been "higher than it's ever been" for the child's entire life is accurate but not the compliment to himself he probably meant. Since bottoming out in 2008, the major American indices have all been steadily higher. More broadly speaking, the same thing is true for the stock market since before the Great Depression.

Trump's apparent belief that Coasties are motivated by their "401(k)s" is also telling. Members of the military don't have them, but they do have access to a similar tax-advantaged defined-contribution program known as a Thrift Savings Plan (TSP). Unlike most other federal or private-sector employees, most members of the military do not get their contributions matched, and contributions are capped at 5% of salary.

A typical chief petty officer (E-7) in the Coast Guard who made the maximum contribution last year to his or her TSP, and invested it in a low-cost S&P 500 index fund, would be putting about $2,000 into the stock market and would have realized about $182 in gains since Trump's inauguration. This is slightly more than the $158 that would have been earned to date in a typical year--the average S&P 500 return is about 9.6%--and much less than the $605 that would have been returned between the day Barack Obama took office and Nov. 26, 2009.

As a rule, military servicemembers do not cite the fact that the TSP allows them to defer taxes on 5% their income as a reason for undertaking military service.

Net worth.  Trump's personal wealth has always been difficult to estimate, if only because he has openly admitted in the past to making up numbers based on his "feelings." (In his words, “My net worth fluctuates, and it goes up and down with markets and with attitudes and with feelings, even my own feelings.") But according to an analysis published this week in Crain's New York Business, the sales figures reported by the Trump Organization (the main source of Trump's income) in the past were "flagrantly untrue" and over-reported its income by a factor of ten or more.

The difference is that this year, some details of Trump Organization finances are public because Trump holds public office, making its valuation less a matter of "feelings" and more a matter of actual money.

Ironically, while an S&P index fund won't make a big difference to the financial security of the typical Coast Guard member, Trump himself would apparently be much wealthier today if he had simply poured his enormous inheritance into one and played golf, rather than trying and frequently failing to make money himself. $40 million, which is a plausible estimate for how much money Trump had received from his father by 1974, would have yielded roughly $4 billion today.

Why are these bad things?

  • A president should not be so afraid of the press that he sends his staff out to chastise them for asking questions about thankfulness on Thanksgiving.
  • Even if a president thinks he, and not the military he commands, is responsible for military successes, saying so right in front of them is a pretty dickish thing to do.
  • A president who thinks 401(k)s are what military personnel care about--or can even get through their military jobs--is dangerously out of touch.
  • Past a certain point, lying in order to make yourself seem more accomplished becomes pathological.

Sunday, November 5, 2017

Sunday Week in Review, self-reflection edition

What else did Donald Trump do this week?

He shared some of his thoughts on the subject of Donald Trump.

He's not mad. In the midst of the fallout from the double-barreled Mueller investigation news, which saw his campaign chair indicted for conspiracy against the United States, and his foreign policy advisor plead guilty to lying to the FBI about meeting with Russia on behalf of the campaign, Trump was calm.

We know this because he called the New York Times on Wednesday to announce that he was calm. “I’m actually not angry at anybody,” Trump said in the unsolicited interview.

That having been said, Trump may want to inform the dozens of sources from inside his own administration who have repeatedly described his reaction to the Mueller probe as "fuming," "seething" (a word used more than once), or "freaking out."

He's quite popular. In the same call, Trump reminded the NYT of his enduring popularity, saying, “I just got fantastic poll numbers." This came shortly after he hit record lows in both the benchmark Gallup and NBC/Wall Street Journal polls.

He's perfect. Press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was asked on Wednesday what Trump's flaws are. "Probably that he has to deal with you guys on a daily basis," she responded. Pressed for a serious answer after polite chuckles from the press corps, Sanders grew serious and said "I just gave you one" and moved on to the next question.

Sanders cannot be accused of putting words in Trump's mouth: he has never, to all appearances, ever identified anything he is deficient in. (The list of things he considers himself the best at is somewhat longer.) 

He matters.  Asked by a Fox News interviewer on Thursday whether his failure to address the critical shortage of State Department personnel was hurting his agenda, Trump had this reassuring response: "Let me tell you, the one that matters is me. I'm the only one that matters."

Why do these things matter?

  • Whether they are presidents or adolescent children, people who are not upset rarely if ever call people up to declare that they are not upset.
  • A president at 33% approval is in no sense of the word popular.
  • While nobody doubts the sincerity of Trump's belief that only he matters, the belief itself is not a good sign.

Wednesday, November 1, 2017

What did Donald Trump do today?

He called the federal judicial system a "joke."

Speaking from the White House about yesterday's terror attack in New York, Trump called the American justice system a "joke" and a "laughingstock" and suggested that the deliberative following of due process is the reason that terror attacks occur.
That was a horrible event, and we have to stop it, and we have to stop it cold. We also have to come up with punishment that’s far quicker and far greater than the punishment these animals are getting right now. They’ll go through court for years. And at the end, they’ll be — who knows what happens. We need quick justice and we need strong justice — much quicker and much stronger than we have right now. Because what we have right now is a joke and it’s a laughingstock. And no wonder so much of this stuff takes place. 
Later, Sarah Huckabee Sanders denied that Trump had said any of this.
Q Why did the President call the U.S. justice system a joke and a laughingstock during his comments in the Cabinet?

MS. SANDERS: That's not what he said.
But, of course, it was what he said. Pressed for clarification, Sanders insisted that Trump was talking about the judicial "process" rather than the judicial system.
MS. SANDERS: He said that process. He said the process has people calling us a joke and calling us a laughingstock.
Sanders did not explain the distinction between the "system" and the "process," or how the judicial system was inviting further terrorist attacks, or who other than Trump is afraid people are laughing at it, or what parts of due process Trump wanted to do away with.

Why should I care about this?

  • Until today, Trump seemed more concerned that the federal justice system was working too quickly and too effectively.

Tuesday, October 31, 2017

What did Donald Trump do today?

He demanded through a surrogate that the media stop talking about race.

In today's briefing, press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was asked about an interview in which White House chief of staff John Kelly said that the Civil War could have been avoided through "compromise," and in which he praised the "honorable" character of Robert E. Lee. (Lee was a slaveowner who is known to have personally abused those he held in bondage.)

Asked to acknowledge the fact that many found Kelly's comments racially offensive, Sanders responded that the claim was "outrageous and absurd" and blamed the media for depicting the Trump White House as a "racially charged" place.

What counts as "racially charged" is a matter of opinion, but just since taking office, Trump--who describes himself as "the least racist person"--has personally done the following:

So what?

  • Presidents don't actually get to dictate how they're covered by the news media.
  • Saying that nobody was offended by praise for a slaveowner's character doesn't make it true.

Saturday, October 28, 2017

What did Donald Trump do today?

He dispatched his press secretary to accuse Hillary Clinton of the things he and his campaign are being investigated for.

Yesterday, the federal grand jury in the Mueller investigation returned its first indictments. While the targets are not yet known, at least one target--Trump's campaign chair, Paul Manafort--had already been told by Mueller that he could expect to face charges.

Today, press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders took to Twitter to claim that Hillary Clinton, and not Trump, had "colluded" with the Russian government. To substantiate this claim, she pointed to the fact that law firms employed by the DNC had helped to fund the research that became part of the Steele dossier. This is a report compiled by a former British intelligence agency that claims that the Putin regime has been actively cultivating Trump as a (possibly unwitting) means to the end of sowing chaos in American politics.

Because the Trump team's public relations strategy relies on painting the report as partisan anti-Republican lies, Sanders did not mention that the report was originally commissioned by the ultra-conservative Washington Free Beacon, which abandoned its efforts to derail the Trump campaign once he clinched the GOP nomination. 

No part of the Steele dossier has been discredited, and many of its most serious allegations regarding secret contacts between Trump's inner circle and agents of the Russian government have been independently confirmed. It is a matter of absolute certainty among American law enforcement and intelligence agencies that Russia deliberately acted to undermine faith in American democracy and sow chaos in its government by helping elect Donald Trump.

Why should anyone care about this?

  • It's bad if a hostile foreign power has successfully carried out an attack on the American democratic process itself.
  • Someone who doesn't want people looking into his past probably shouldn't run for president.
  • Eventually Donald Trump will have to stop blaming people who aren't president for the problems of his presidency.

Tuesday, October 24, 2017

What did Donald Trump do today?

He repeated an already disproven lie about Sen. Bob Corker's (R-TN) position on the Iran nuclear agreement.

Trump began the day agitated even by the usual grumpy standards of his morning Twitter rants, lashing out in a five-tweet tirade that Sen. Corker "helped President O give us the bad Iran Deal." 

In reality, as chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Corker did more than almost anyone else in the Senate to frustrate approval of the original deal, forcing the Obama administration to include provisions for congressional oversight of the process. Corker did vote for the revised version--and so did almost every other member of Congress. It passed 98-1 in the Senate and 400-25 in the House. 

(Trump's objection to the six-nation agreement seems to be mostly about his belief that he is a master negotiator, and that it happened on President Obama's watch.)

Repeatedly asked to explain Trump's comments, press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders insisted that it was Corker alone who had "rolled out the red carpet" for the agreement and not the other 497 members of Congress who voted for it. 

Why does this matter?

  • False statements do not become true just because a president keeps saying them.


Tuesday, October 10, 2017

What did Donald Trump do today?

He challenged Rex Tillerson to an IQ test face-off, and then sent a surrogate out to explain that he was just joking.

The story so far: last Wednesday, the news broke that Secretary of State Rex Tillerson had called Trump a "fucking moron" in a July meeting and had to be talked out of resigning by Vice-President Mike Pence. Predictably, Trump--who until then had been shielded from the news by aides--was enraged, and forced the normally reclusive Tillerson to make a rare public appearance in which he denied that there was tension between himself and Trump. (He did not, however, directly deny the "moron" remark, which was independently confirmed by other news outlets.) 

Trump channeled most of his anger into attacks on the "fake news" media that had told him about Tillerson's remarks in the first place. But he was still bothered enough during an interview with Forbes two days later to snipe at Tillerson's intelligence:
Forbes: There are reports out today over the last couple days about [Tillerson] calling you a moron privately. Has he talked, reached out to you about that? Do you believe that he said that? 
Trump: Well, we may have to, if he did that--which he says he didn't, by the way, he said he didn't. And they announced with the State Department that he didn't. I think it's fake news, but if he did that, I guess we'll have to compare IQ tests. And I can tell you who is going to win.
That interview was published today, prompting reporters to ask press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders the obvious question:
Q. How does the President expect his Secretary of State to be effective when he’s questioning his intelligence? 
MS. SANDERS: Again, he wasn’t questioning the Secretary of State’s intelligence. He made –- 
Q. Why does he think he has a higher IQ, effectively, than the Secretary of State? 
MS. SANDERS: He made a joke. Maybe you guys should get a sense of humor and try it sometime. But he simply made a joke.
That would be easier to believe if Trump were not famously obsessed with his own superior IQ (as he sees it), or if his handlers hadn't already used the joke excuse a few too many times already.

Why should anyone care about this?

  • It's bad if a president can be provoked into careless behavior when he's upset.
  • It's worse if that president is so easily upset in the first place.
  • A president whose "jokes" always need to be explained should probably try to stop "joking."

Thursday, October 5, 2017

What did Donald Trump do today?

He called for the Senate Intelligence Committee to investigate "the Fake News Networks in OUR country to see why so much of our news is just made up-FAKE!"

Trump's 6:59 A.M. tweet came after two stories he is known to have been obsessed with recently: the still-unrefuted revelation that his Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, called him a "fucking moron" in a meeting and had to be talked out of resigning, and the confirmation by that Senate committee of the unanimous consensus that Russia had intervened (with genuinely "fake news" among other things) in the 2016 election on his behalf.

The tweet made for a somewhat bizarre press briefing today: Sarah Huckabee Sanders attempted to walk back the tweet, but without saying so in a way that would result in her explicitly contradicting Trump. Asked to confirm Trump's specific request--that he wanted the Intelligence Committee to investigate American reporters and media organizations--Sanders said, "I don't know that that's the case." According to NBC reporter Kristen Welker, during that same briefing, one reporter shouted, "By fake news, does he mean reports he doesn't like?" Sanders did not acknowledge the question.

Why is this a problem?

  • News isn't fake just because the president doesn't like it.

Sunday, September 17, 2017

Sunday Week in Review, grudge edition

What else did Donald Trump do this week?

He revisited some cherished old grudges, and started some new ones.

"Pharma bro." Martin Shkreli, the universally loathed pharmaceutical executive facing sentencing for securities fraud, had his bail revoked this week for tweets in which he encouraged people to grab hair from Hillary Clinton's head. In a last-ditch attempt to keep their client out of jail, his lawyers cited none other than Trump, arguing that his use of "political hyperbole" during and after the campaign had blurred the line between a legitimate threat and free speech. Among other things, Trump suggested that "second amendment people" were the only thing that could prevent Clinton from appointing federal judges who'd restrict gun rights if she were elected. (As with Shkreli's tweet, that incident prompted the attention of the Secret Service.)

Trump may or may not be aware of his influence on Shkreli, but it's not all they have in common. This morning, as part of a tweet-storm bizarre even by Trump standards, he retweeted an animation of him hitting a golf ball and knocking Hillary Clinton over.

Trump is a lot more sensitive to jokes about violence towards politicians when he's the target.

Clinton Clinton Clinton. The golf tweet wasn't Trump's only indulgence this week of his ongoing obsession with Clinton, who recently released a book about the campaign in which she acknowledges the ongoing investigation into the Trump campaign's involvement with the Russian government's attempt to get him elected. Trump, who is easily upset by Clinton under the best of circumstances, fired off angry tweets and sent his press secretary, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, out to attack Clinton.

Again with the hands thing. Trump traveled to Florida to pose for photos amidst relief efforts for Hurricane Irma. During a few minutes of handing out sandwiches, he mugged for the cameras by visibly struggling to put on plastic gloves, declaring, "They're too small."

He did the same my-hands-are-too-big schtick earlier in the month during his do-over visit to Harvey relief efforts.

Trump has been on a short fuse over the size of his hands since Spy magazine editor Graydon Carter called him a "short-fingered vulgarian" more than a quarter of a century ago. This apparently got even deeper than usual under Trump's skin, who over the years sent photographs of his hands to Carter in an attempt to disprove the joke, and then (apropos of nothing) escalated it into a discussion of the size of his penis during a presidential debate.

Congress. Normally Congress does not bother passing joint resolutions "rejecting White nationalists, White supremacists, the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis, and other hate groups, and urging the President and the President's Cabinet to use all available resources to address the threats posed by those groups." But it did so on Tuesday, unanimously in both houses, as a reaction to Trump's equivocation about whether those groups also contained some "very fine people," or whether the terrorist murder of a counter-protestor was part of violence "on many sides."

On Thursday, Trump signed the resolution--and then immediately sought out reporters to declare that "you have some pretty bad dudes on the other [non-Klan, non-neo-Nazi] side also" and singled out anti-fascist groups as evidence that he was right all along. He did not mention white nationalists, white supremacists, the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis, or other hate groups in his remarks.

The remarks prompted the Senate's only black Republican, Tim Scott (R-SC) to tell reporters that it was "unrealistic" to expect Trump to find his way to an unequivocal condemnation of neo-Nazis and Klansmen in so short a period of time.

ESPN. On a related note, Trump devoted a fair amount of his time this week--to say nothing of other White House employees'--to a new vendetta against the sports network ESPN and its anchor Jemele Hill.

On Monday, Hill tweeted that "Donald Trump is a white supremacist who has largely surrounded himself w/ other white supremacists." She later acknowledged that the tweet was inappropriate as it suggested she was speaking for ESPN, and apologized to the network, but stood by her words.

Trump responded by mocking the network's supposedly low ratings in a tweet (a favorite insult, given his obsession with TV), and by once again sending out Sarah Huckabee Sanders three days in a row to call for Hill's firing. (Sanders, who may have committed a crime in following Trump's orders, had a busy week: she was also the designated attack-surrogate for Trump's renewed campaign against Jim Comey.)

Hill is not alone in her opinion, but for whatever reason Trump was apparently far more upset by being called a racist by her than he was when similar accusations were made by the New York Times's Nicholas Kristof, Jesse Berney of Rolling Stone, the Washington Post's Dana Milbank, and dozens of other white men.

Why are these bad things?

  • A president who can be this easily upset is a president who can just as easily be manipulated.
  • It should not be possible to upset a president by talking about an election that he won, or by condemning neo-Nazis and the Klan.
  • "Pharma Bro" isn't a good role model for the President of the United States.
  • A president who doesn't want to be called a white supremacist could always take an unequivocal line against white supremacists.


Wednesday, September 13, 2017

What did Donald Trump do today?

He sent a surrogate out for the third consecutive day to declare James Comey a lawbreaker.

Today marked the third straight day on which press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was sent out to accuse former FBI Director James Comey of having committed crimes. The pattern of these accusations is instructive. On Monday, Sanders accused Comey of false "testimony"--she refused to say when--and suggested that the Department of Justice should "look into it." Yesterday, she said he'd leaked "privileged" information. (There is no "privilege" between the DOJ and the White House, and the material Comey made public was not classified.) 

Today, she tried a third tack: that Comey's notes on the Russia investigation--including the memos he dictated to document Trump's attempts to influence him--"followed the protocol of an FBI document" and therefore, by her interpretation of various laws, could not legally be released. Pressed for details, Sanders retreated, saying "I'm certainly not an attorney" and insisting that it was for the Justice Department to decide. (Those who are attorneys expressed serious doubts about the supposed criminality of Comey's actions based on Sanders's description.)

As Trump has slowly and painfully learned, he cannot simply order the Justice Department to start or stop a criminal investigation--at least not without potentially committing a crime himself. (Firing Comey, a DOJ employee, for refusing to stop investigating Michael Flynn is one example.) The blizzard of accusations from Sanders seems to be Trump's next best attempt to "suggest" a course of action to the DOJ without technically, explicitly ordering them to do anything. But it also served as a rebuttal to ex-advisor Steve Bannon, who this past Sunday declared the Comey firing Trump's biggest mistake to date.

Why is this a problem?

  • A president hiding behind a press flack hiding behind her own ignorance of the law isn't exactly demonstrating courage and leadership.
  • The independence of the federal judiciary is more important than solving any given president's criminal exposure.
  • If a president can be goaded into this kind of behavior just because an unrelated third party criticized him, he can be manipulated by anyone.