Saturday, May 31, 2025

What did Donald Trump do today?

He withdrew for corrupt reasons a nomination he'd made for corrupt reasons.

The New York Times is reporting today that Trump will withdraw his nomination of Jared Isaacman to be the next NASA administrator. Isaacman, a tech industry billionaire, is a close associate of Elon Musk, Trump's biggest political benefactor and the person who has most directly shared in Trump's powers as president.

The working and personal relationship between Musk and Isaacman was expected to work to the benefit of Musk's company SpaceX, which is already a private middleman company for space vehicles that used to be built by NASA itself, or by a wider network of contractors. Trump's proposed budget slashes NASA funding by nearly a quarter, which would increase the government's reliance on SpaceX and lead to windfall profits for Musk, already the world's richest man.

But Musk has recently found his free run of the White House curtailed by an internal power struggle. The crux of it appears to be Trump aide Stephen Miller, who has been trashing Musk on social media and is generally understood to be the source of several recent and embarrassing stories about Musk's drug abuse and the complete failure of DOGE to reduce government spending. Meanwhile, Miller's wife, Katie Miller, now works for SpaceX and is rumored to be in a romantic or open relationship with Musk.

This kind of palace intrigue was common during Trump's first term, when it was generally understood that the faction that could arrange to get his attention at the right moment—to be the last voice in his ear before a decision was made—would usually get their way.

Of course, the rationale being offered by the Trump White House is not that Trump is a pawn in a war between his staff and his financial backer. Instead, it is that Isaacman donated money to Democratic political campaigns. (One of them was to Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona—a former astronaut.)

In other words, Trump's official story is that Isaacman is being preemptively punished for lack of perceived absolutely loyalty to Trump—not that he was a crony appointment from the start whose patron fell out of favor.

Why does this matter?

  • Both explanations are completely incompatible with how democracies are supposed to work.  
  • It shouldn't be this easy to manipulate the President of the United States.

Friday, May 30, 2025

What did Donald Trump do today?

He didn't really seem to know whether Elon Musk was leaving his government "job," although he wasn't alone in that.

Today, Trump held an Oval Office event in which he appeared with Elon Musk, his chief political patron. The occasion was Musk's supposed retreat from government work as the de facto head of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE.

It was never clear who, as a legal matter, was in charge of DOGE. Trump consistently said that it was Musk. Musk himself also implied as much, albeit in ways that seemed to preserve his ability to claim otherwise under oath. Pressed by various judges in lawsuits involving DOGE, the administration eventually decided it was a bureaucrat named Amy Gleason—apparently without telling her in advance. And recently, spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said without further explanation that the head of DOGE was the entire Cabinet, including Trump

Musk has been grating on Trump's other handlers since the week after the election, and appears to have been finally pushed out in a classic power struggle between factions competing for control of the Trump agenda. 

But Trump himself may not fully understand that: his remarks today suggested that Musk was not, in fact, actually leaving DOGE at all

Over the last few days, several stories have run in major newspapers about Musk's rampant drug use and its obvious and troubling effects on him. In particular, they focus on his abuse of the dissociative drug ketamine. This is old news where Musk is concerned: Tesla board members reported years ago that Musk pressured them to do the drug with him. But the recent stories were the first time such testimony had come from sources from inside the Trump White House.

During his appearance with Trump, Musk lolled his head and rolled his eyes back, seeming to lose focus. He also mentioned, unprompted and without further elaboration, that the fresh black eye he was sporting came from having asked his five-year-old son to punch him in the face.

Why does this matter?

  • It's a bad sign when Donald Trump is not the most erratic person in a Donald Trump administration.  
  • One reason the powers of the presidency shouldn't be for sale to the highest bidder is that the highest bidder so often turns out to be someone like Elon Musk. 

Thursday, May 29, 2025

What did Donald Trump do today?

He suffered "mental anguish," at least according to his lawyers.

Trump refused to sit for an interview with the CBS news program 60 Minutes during the campaign season last fall. His opponent, Vice-President Kamala Harris, did. During the Harris interview, Bill Whitaker asked Harris about how the United States could keep Israel's war on Gaza from getting further out of control. Harris's answer was lengthy, and was edited for time in the version that broadcast. A different, longer excerpt was shown as a preview on the CBS show Face the Nation.

As CBS pointed out at the time, interviews like this are almost always edited, and their treatment of Harris's answer did not change its meaning or conceal anything she had said. In fact, the interview won an Emmy for Best Edited Interview—a longstanding category in the TV industry awards—earlier this month. Trump himself has sat for edited interviews since.

Trump then sued the parent company of CBS for twenty billion dollars.

Today's filing revealed more about why Trump believes he is entitled to the median annual income of 248,000 American households (or about 620,000 people—roughly the entire gross pay of every single person in Memphis, TN) over the editing of an interview he didn't even take part in. 

In short, Trump claims that he suffered "mental anguish."

Trump also claims that other "consumers" also suffered similar "mental anguish"—but only he would get paid if he prevailed in the suit.

Trump's emotional state has been much in the news lately, as it was during his first term. Earlier this week, the Putin regime mocked Trump's frustration at his inability to force a ceasefire in the Russia-Ukraine war by saying that he was having an "emotional overload." Yesterday, Trump became visibly furious when a reporter asked him about the Wall Street slang term "TACO trade." That is an acronym for "Trump Always Chickens Out," meaning investments made on the safe assumption that Trump will never actually impose meaningful tariffs and will always back down in short order—which is exactly what has happened over and over again since he tried to relaunch his trade war.

Trump did not comment on his ongoing mental anguish today, or whether he has needed the services of psychological or spiritual counselors to help him work through it—which is the sort of evidence that courts usually look for in emotional distress claims. But he did bang out a 505-word super-tweet to his boutique microblogging site in which he lashed out at an ultra-conservative legal activist who he now believes took advantage of his naïveté when he was a young and innocent first-term president of 70.
 

Why does this matter?

  • If Trump is telling the truth about his "anguish" over something he saw on TV, he is far too emotionally fragile to serve as president—or even control his own affairs without the help of a legal guardian.
  • If he's lying, then it's merely pathetic.

Wednesday, May 28, 2025

What did Donald Trump do today?

He issued more pardons of the particular type he favors.

Trump has issued a spree of pardons and clemencies over the last few days. As is virtually always the case with Trump, they share a few common themes: either they are for crimes that Trump is known to have committed, or they are for people who have given Trump money, or they are for people who are or are willing to become his political allies, or they have some connection to the world of reality TV.

Todd and Julie Chrisley were convicted of fraud and tax evasion. The couple had starred for years on a reality TV show on the USA Network. Their daughter, Savannah Chrisley, is a professional conservative "influencer." Thanks to a pardon Trump signed yesterday, both were released from prison today.

John Rowland is the former Republican governor of Connecticut. He was convicted in 2004 of public corruption and tax fraud, and in a separate 2014 trial for violating campaign laws, lying to the FEC, and fraud. Trump pardoned him today.

  • In addition to the tax and fraud crimes mentioned above, Trump has been accused of any number of campaign violations, though while he was in office his own hand-picked commissioners were able to block further action against him. His 2024 conviction turned in part on the fact that his attempt to cover up his affair with porn actress Stormy Daniels by paying her $130,000 for her silence was itself a campaign finance crime: by failing to disclose it as required by law, he was in effect paying for publicity off the books.

Michael Grimm is a former Republican member of Congress from New York. He, too, was convicted of tax fraud and was investigated by the FBI for campaign finance violations. After being forced to resign from Congress, he worked in conservative media as part of the pro-Trump media ecosystem.

Jeremy Hutchinson, son of Arkansas' Republican former governor Asa Hutchinson, also committed tax fraud and accepted bribes and was convicted in 2023. The younger Hutchinson was a member of the Arkansas legislature took money in exchange for his votes to benefit a healthcare organization.  

  • Trump hasn't been formally convicted of bribery, but he has created an astonishing number of ways for people or countries to overtly or covertly funnel money to his interests, as the following example demonstrates:

Paul Walczak is another tax cheat Trump pardoned this week, although not one with the public profile of the Chrisleys or national politicians. He stole money he collected for his employees' Social Security contributions to buy a yacht—meaning that he wasn't simply stealing from the taxpayers, but hurting his workers' retirement benefits. Trump's pardon means that Walczak will profit from his crime, because he will no longer be obliged to pay the taxpayers back the $4.4 million he stole.

Earl Lamont Smith is a former Army reservist who was convicted of stealing government property. Trump pardoned him today.

Scott Jenkins is a "wonderful person" who was "dragged through hell" and "left for dead" by "radical Left monsters"—according to Trump's pardon statement for the former Culpeper County, VA sheriff, who was one of Trump's vocal supporters in the swing state.

Why does this matter?

  • "It's not illegal if it helps the Leader" is how dictatorships work.

Tuesday, May 27, 2025

What did Donald Trump do today?

He completely froze one of the largest American industries.

International students represent an enormous source of income for the United States, adding $44 billion to the economy and supporting almost 400,000 jobs, by one conservative estimate. Foreign students are a source of prestige, political power, and global influence for the United States. They also burnish American higher education's standing as the gold standard not only for overall quality, but for its contributions to science, technology, and medical research. By admitting the very best students from foreign countries, the United States gains not only the benefit of their talents, but also the chance to bring them within the fold. 

In other words, for the better part of a century, the United States have been the greener pastures that have lured the world's most promising students and researchers. "Brain drain" has worked exclusively to the United States' benefit for all that time—at least, until now.

The result of all of this is an enormously profitable and symbiotic relationship between American colleges and universities and the roughly 5% of their student bodies that are from countries other than the United States. The United States receives a financial benefit bigger than the profits from almost any other sector of the domestic economy: for example, it brings in twice as much foreign money than the entire iron and steel industry. As one recent editorial put it, foreign students are "the greatest free lunch in history" for the United States.

But not everyone is allowed to study in the United States. Students must rigorously demonstrate that they are able to financially support themselves before coming to the United States. Countries hostile to the United States cannot send students to American universities. Colleges and universities must vouch for the presence and academic progress of all foreign students they admit. And all international students must be interviewed by an American consular official.

As of today, Trump has halted all consular interviews, effective immediately and indefinitely.

The stated rationale for the freeze is to increase scrutiny of prospective students' social media accounts, to scan for political ideologies that contradict the Trump administration's views—which is to say, defining any such contradictory views as "antisemitism" or "terrorism," regardless of their content. Normally, international students choose American universities precisely because they won't be subjected to restrictions on their political speech. But in a transparent attempt to change that perception, Trump has had international students with valid visas imprisoned for views they expressed long before he even took office, and which are protected by the First Amendment.

A spokesperson refused to give further details, or to guarantee that the freeze would be lifted before it effectively destroyed international student admission for the fall semester.

Why does this matter?

  • It's only "terrorism" to contradict the leader in a dictatorship.
  • International students, even more so than immigrants in general, are not a threat to the United States.
  • There are no good reasons to want to undermine the greatest system of higher education in the world—but there are a few evil ones.

Monday, May 26, 2025

What did Donald Trump do today?

He got called "emotional" by the Putin regime, and reacted emotionally.

Since Russia's invasion of eastern Ukraine began in 2022, the Putin regime has needlessly killed people, to include civilians. Russia has fired missiles and used drone attacks against cities for no military purpose other than to create terror in civilian populations.

Yesterday, Trump seemed to notice for the first time, complaining that Putin "is needlessly killing a lot of people, and I'm not just talking about soldiers. Missiles and drones are being shot into Cities in Ukraine, for no reason whatsoever."

For context, when Putin began the very same campaign in February 2022, Trump reacted this way:

I went in yesterday and there was a television screen, and I said, "This is genius." Putin declares a big portion of the Ukraine — of Ukraine — Putin declares it as independent. Oh, that’s wonderful. He used the word "independent" and "we’re gonna go out and we’re gonna go in and we’re gonna help keep peace." You gotta say that’s pretty savvy.

A Russian spokesperson responded by saying that Trump was having an "emotional reaction" and suffering from "emotional overload."

Trump has invested his personal pride in being able to end "in one day" the bitter conflict between the pro-Western Ukraine and the Putin regime. His attempts at doing so have mostly taken the form of "deals" where Russia keeps the Ukrainian territory it has occupied already and promises not to go any further. But neither side has any real reason to want this: for Ukraine it would be suicide, and for the Putin regime, it would be leaving the war half-finished, because without military support from the United States, Russia is likely to succeed in overrunning Ukraine entirely.

Trump has repeatedly signaled that the United States will stop military aid to Ukraine, and even his outbursts yesterday—which were indeed "emotional"—didn't suggest any change in that policy. In fact, his social media posts only reinforced the idea that he would withdraw the United States entirely—which is exactly what the "savvy" "genius" Vladimir Putin wants.

The Russian response calling Trump "emotional" came overnight, and was being reported on before 6:00 A.M. in the Eastern time zone. A little over an hour later, Trump posted this to his private microblogging site:

HAPPY MEMORIAL DAY TO ALL, INCLUDING THE SCUM THAT SPENT THE LAST FOUR YEARS TRYING TO DESTROY OUR COUNTRY THROUGH WARPED RADICAL LEFT MINDS, WHO ALLOWED 21,000,000 MILLION PEOPLE TO ILLEGALLY ENTER OUR COUNTRY, MANY OF THEM BEING CRIMINALS AND THE MENTALLY INSANE,THROUGH AN OPEN BORDER THAT ONLY AN INCOMPETENT PRESIDENT WOULD APPROVE, AND THROUGH JUDGES WHO ARE ON A MISSION TO KEEP MURDERERS, DRUG DEALERS, RAPISTS, GANG MEMBERS, AND RELEASED PRISONERS FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD, IN OUR COUNTRY SO THEY CAN ROB, MURDER, AND RAPE AGAIN — ALL PROTECTED BY THESE USA HATING JUDGES WHO SUFFER FROM AN IDEOLOGY THAT IS SICK, AND VERY DANGEROUS FOR OUR COUNTRY. HOPEFULLY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, AND OTHER GOOD AND COMPASSIONATE JUDGES THROUGHOUT THE LAND, WILL SAVE US FROM THE DECISIONS OF THE MONSTERS WHO WANT OUR COUNTRY TO GO TO HELL. BUT FEAR NOT, WE HAVE MADE GREAT PROGRESS OVER THE LAST 4 MONTHS, AND AMERICA WILL SOON BE SAFE AND GREAT AGAIN! AGAIN, HAPPY MEMORIAL DAY, AND GOD BLESS AMERICA!

Trump often uses holiday messages to lash out at his imagined enemies, but even by his standards, this Memorial Day "greeting" that never mentioned America's military dead was emotionally charged.

Why does this matter?

  • It shouldn't be this easy for a hostile foreign power to manipulate the President of the United States. 
  • Nobody who had been paying attention to the war at any point over the last three years would be surprised by Russia's conduct over the last week or so.
  • This is why it's a bad idea to seek the approval of dictators.

Sunday, May 25, 2025

What did Donald Trump do today?

He ranted twice about Harvard.

Trump was up past midnight and agitated Sunday morning, posting this at 12:51 A.M.:

Why isn’t Harvard saying that almost 31% of their students are from FOREIGN LANDS, and yet those countries, some not at all friendly to the United States, pay NOTHING toward their student’s education, nor do they ever intend to. Nobody told us that! We want to know who those foreign students are, a reasonable request since we give Harvard BILLIONS OF DOLLARS, but Harvard isn’t exactly forthcoming. We want those names and countries. Harvard has $52,000,000, use it, and stop asking for the Federal Government to continue GRANTING money to you!

(The federal government doesn't "give" Harvard or thousands of other American universities anything. Instead, it contracts with them for specific work—contracts that the Trump administration is now trying to break.)

Trump repeated similar comments this afternoon on his return from his usual weekend at his golf resort:

 

Trump: "Part of the problem w/ Harvard is there are about 31% of foreigners coming to Harvard...but they refuse to tell us who the people are...it shouldn't be 31%. It's too much. Bc we have Americans who want to go there...we want a list of those students...I assume with Harvard many will be bad"

[image or embed]

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) May 25, 2025 at 5:25 PM


In other words, Trump appears to be saying—and may actually believe—that Harvard is admitting international students without visas, or (somehow) getting them visas without informing the government that grants them. 

This is, to put it mildly, nonsense. The "list" of Harvard's international student population is the one that the United States government makes itself.  There are no F-1 visas to study at Harvard University in the United States that the government of the United States doesn't know about, because the government of the United States issues those visas.

For context, Trump tried earlier this week to decertify Harvard University's ability to sponsor student visas, something that was so clearly an attempt by the Trump administration to force Harvard to promote its political views that it was immediately stayed by a court. Trump's order would have caused massive chaos for Harvard and its 7,000 international students, which seems to have been the point.

American universities are—for the moment—the envy of the world, and admitting international students is a massive economic boon for the United States. It's also an important form of "soft power:" foreign students who benefit from an American education and see American culture up close during their formative years help strengthen their home countries' business, political, or cultural ties to the United States. Foreign enrollment in American colleges and universities also gives the United States the opportunity to benefit from and recruit the best researchers, scholars, doctors, and engineers the world has to offer.

Trump is not entirely without relevant life experience here. He operated a fake "university" himself, at least until lawsuits and regulators shut it down. He's also been caught hiring actually undocumented workers at his construction sites and resort properties throughout his career.

Why does this matter?

  • There is no secret shadowy organization that is hiding "bad" students in plain sight in Harvard classrooms, and it's bad if the President of the United States is somehow convinced there is.
  • Foreign students paying money to legally attend American colleges on valid visas is not a problem for anyone and it's stupid to try to fearmonger about it.
  • Emotional dysregulation and confusion in the evenings or late at night is called "sundowning" and it's not a sign of good cognitive health.

Saturday, May 24, 2025

What did Donald Trump do today?

He gave graduating West Point seniors some advice.

Decked out in a hot pink tie and campaign baseball hat, Trump gave the commencement address to the graduating class at West Point today. Trump, whose draft-dodging is common knowledge and and who famously called America's war dead "suckers" and "losers," nevertheless seems to enjoy speaking to military audiences, where discipline and protocol mean that he will never have to worry about a crowd's reaction.

As he does in most speeches, Trump walked the graduates through a litany of grievances he had over his impeachments and criminal convictions. He directly insulted the military leadership that the graduates will be serving under. He said that he—not the military, but he himself—had "defeated ISIS in three weeks." (No part of that is true.) And he let the nation's newest crop of Army officers in on a secret: "We have introduced a thing called drones." 

Then, apparently departing from his script, he told this story to the young men and women who will now begin their careers as commissioned Army officers. A video clip can be seen here, and as is often the case with Trump, hearing it is a different kind of experience than reading it.

Momentum is an amazing thing. Keep it going. I tell a story sometimes about a man who was a great, great real estate man. He was a man who was admired for real estate all over the world actually. All over the country. He built Levittown. He started as a man who built one house, then two, then five, then he built 20. He built a thousand. Then he built two thousand and three thousand a year. He got very big. He was great at what he did. You see him all of the country still. 

Levittowns. This was a long time ago. 

He was the first of the really, really big homebuilders. He became very rich. A very rich man. And then he decided to sell. He was offered a lot of money by a big conglomerate, Golf and Western—Gulf and Western. They saw the money he was making. They gave him a lot of money, tremendous amount of money. More money than he thought he would get. He sold his company and he had nothing to do. We ended up getting a divorce. Found the new wife. 

Can you say a trophy wife? It didn't work out too well. That doesn't work out too well, i must tell you. Trophy wives. It made him happy for a little while at least. 

He found a new wife. He sold his little boat and got a big yacht. He had one of the biggest yachts anywhere in the world. He moved to Monte Carlo and led the good life. Time went by and he got bored. Fifteen years later, the company he sold to call him. They said "That housing business is not for us." 

You have to understand, when Bill Levitt was hot, he had momentum, he would go to the job sites every night and take up every loose nail. He would pick up every scrap of wood. If there was a bolt or screw lying on the ground, he would pick it up and use it the next day putting together a house. Now he was spoiled and rich. He was really rich. They called and said this is not for us, this business. Would you like to buy it back? We will sell it back to you cheap. 

He bought it. He bought it. He thought he made a great deal. He was all excited. It was 15 years later. He lost a lot of momentum. Remember the word momentum. 

He lost everything. It just didn't work. I was sitting at a party on Fifth Avenue one night a long time ago. The biggest people in New York, the biggest people in the country were all at that party and saluting each other, how great they were. They were telling each other how great—I'm greater than you. It gives you a headache sometimes. They had all these people telling their own stories about how fantastic—a cocktail party. 

I looked over and I was doing well. I was invited to the party so I had to be doing well. I was very, very young. I made a name in real estate. 

I looked over at the party, sitting in a corner by himself, nobody talking to him, was Mr. Levitt. He had just gone bankrupt and lost everything. He lost everything. His home, everything. I went over and talked to him. He was in the real estate business and I loved real estate. 

I said, "Hello Mr. Levitt, how are you?" He said, "Hello Donald. Nice to meet you." He knew me from being in the business. "How's it going?" "Not well. Really not well as you have probably read. It's been very tough for me." I said, "What happened? Anything you can do?" "No, there is not a thing I can do."

He said, I will never forget, I have lost my momentum. I just didn't have it. I used to have it but I lost my momentum. 

It is a story I tell. You have to know when you have momentum. Sometimes, you also have to know when you lost the momentum. Leaving a field sometimes, leaving what you are doing sometimes is okay. You have to have momentum. You have to know that momentum is gone. You have to know when to say it is time to get out.

It's a very sad story. I remember that story so well like it was yesterday.


It's not always bad advice to tell someone to give up when things get difficult, but it's not something West Point cadets hear very much.

There are some curious similarities between William Levitt and Trump. Levitt refused to sell his properties to Black buyers, even after racist tactics like deed covenants and other forms of housing discrimination were illegal. Trump's first appearance in the public record was as the defendant, along with his father, in a racial discrimination lawsuit after he, too, refused to rent to Black tenants. Like Trump, Levitt stole money from his self-named "charity." And as Trump's "trophy wife" reference indicates, they were each married three times, with subsequent marriages to women they had had affairs with during previous marriages.

And—Trump's story is accurate on this point—both lost fortunes in real estate. The chief difference is that Levitt mostly lost his own money, while the money Trump lost came from his inheritance, the taxpayers, or other investors.

It's entirely possible that Levitt and Trump really did meet, although when Trump thinks he can get away with it, he often inserts himself into stories. (For example, he once said he competed at a baseball tryout with Giants star Willie McCovey. But McCovey was seven years older than Trump and was playing in the major leagues by the time Trump was 13.)

It's tradition for the President to shake the hand of every graduate when they preside over commencement at one of the service academies. Trump left immediately after his speech.

Why does this matter?

  • Maybe don't tell America's future military leaders to quit when the going gets tough.

Friday, May 23, 2025

What did Donald Trump do today?

He slashed the staff that provides him with the intelligence and foreign policy briefings he doesn't read.

This afternoon, Trump fired a large portion of the staff of the National Security Council. Dozens of analysts were dismissed in what are being called "massive" cuts to the organization.

The NSC is the main source of advice and coordination for the executive branch on matters of national security and foreign policy. Many agencies deal with those matters, but the function of the NSC is to ensure coordination between them, and to make sure that senior White House officials—including and especially the president—are given clear and up-to-date information as situations develop across the world.

The purge comes not long after news broke that Trump's National Security Advisor, Tulsi Gabbard, had pressured intelligence analysts to change their conclusions when they contradicted Trump's preferred, but false, narrative about the supposed threat to the United States posed by street gangs in Venezuela.

Gabbard then fired the analysts who reached the "wrong" conclusions and publicly mocked them.  

It's not clear how much this will affect Trump, who has a deep aversion to actually listening to intelligence briefings. They are prepared daily, but through his first 100 days, Trump sat in on only 12 of them. This was a problem during his first term as well, when analysts were instructed to "jazz them up" with pictures and charts to help keep Trump's attention.

Why does this matter?

  • Expert knowledge and advice is supposed to inform the president's decisions, not the other way around.
  • Breaking the United States' foreign policy and intelligence services only helps the United States' enemies.
  • A president who can't focus on the task at hand unless it's entertaining isn't fit to serve.

Thursday, May 22, 2025

What did Donald Trump do today?

He literally sold access to himself to the highest bidders.

Trump is hosting a dinner tonight for winners of a contest to see who could buy the most of his crypto token. The guest list is secret, but a total of 220 winners will have access to him for the evening, and 25 of the very highest bidders will have him for tomorrow evening, too.

Access to Trump tonight reportedly cost each attendee about $1.5 million, although firm information is hard to come by, by design. It is clear that many if not most of the buyers are foreigners, taking advantage of a rare opportunity to lobby the President of the United States directly, in complete secrecy, and without having to follow otherwise strict U.S. disclosure laws—because the person charged with enforcing them is the beneficiary. 

The $TRUMP token—which is not even a "real" cryptocurrency by the standards of more traditional offerings like Bitcoin—was launched just days before Trump took office. Because it has an unusual structure that even crypto diehards have called a rip-off, Trump personally collects a commission on every sale of the coin between buyers. The coin has zero inherent value—except for its ability to serve as a channel for bribes to Trump, as at least one alleged white collar criminal succeeded in doing recently when he made a $75 million "investment" in Trump coins and immediately saw the SEC drop an investigation into him. 

But because of that commission on every transaction, Trump has an incentive to pump up the trading volume. Hence the contest, which not only created a short-lived increase in the cost of the tokens, but encouraged early buyers who had lost their shirt on the valueless token's immediate crash to sell and cut their losses—and generate new fees for Trump.

Hundreds of thousands of accounts holding $TRUMP have lost money. Only a few dozen have turned a profit, and some of those appear to have been suspiciously timed insider trades.

The White House is refusing to release the names of people who have bought access to Trump tonight, and is generally refusing comment on the matter. Press Secretary Karolina Leavitt would only say that Trump was doing it "on his personal time."

Trump is famous for working short, unstructured hours as President—a few hours a day, and usually no more than four days a week in Washington itself—and that's when he can even stay awake for his presidential duties at all. But regardless, he has no "personal time" when he can take bribes legally: he is the president every hour of every day in his term, as long as it lasts.

Why does this matter?

  • The American people have a right to know who has bought access to the president.
  • Corruption and bribe-taking done in broad daylight are worse than when it's done in secret, not better.

Wednesday, May 21, 2025

What did Donald Trump do today?

He tried another Oval Office ambush today, but it didn't go so well.

Trump hosted South African President Cyril Ramaphosa in the Oval Office today. Trump has been floating false conspiracy theories about "white genocide" at the hands of the South African government. Today, backed by Cabinet members armed with talking points, he peppered Ramaphosa with false claims and fraudulent "evidence" of that non-existent "genocide" taken from fringe websites.

South Africa does have a problem with violence and a high murder rate. But there is no genocide, as virtually all white South Africans themselves say, and Black South Africans are murdered at a higher rate than the white minority. As CNN put it in a fact check:

Claims of genocide can sometimes be difficult to adjudicate. This claim is easy. The facts show that the genocide President Donald Trump suggests might be happening is not happening – and that crime against White farmers in South Africa represents a tiny fraction of the country’s overall crime.

The most recent South African official data shows that the country had 19,696 murders from April 2024 through December 2024 – and that the victim in just 36 of these murders, about 0.2%, was linked to farms or smaller agricultural holdings.

Further, only seven of the 36 victims were farmers. (South Africa has Black farmers, too; the official data is not broken down by race.) The other 29 victims included farm employees, who tend to be Black. 

Trump made no secret of the fact that he was acting on the direction of Elon Musk, his political patron, whose family fortune is rooted in the white supremacist Apartheid era. He brought up Musk's name unprompted, saying, "This is what Elon wanted."

Musk, who is the wealthiest person in the world, seems to relish the idea that he is a persecuted minority. But he's also actively trying to force the South African government to pay for his Starlink satellite service. Musk has been caught using the U.S. State Department to strong-arm other African countries into purchasing it. 

Trump didn't say why, if he thought Ramaphosa's government was committing genocide, he was welcomed as a guest at the White House.

At one point Trump brandished a sheet of paper and said, "Look, here's burial sites all over the place. These are all white farmers that are being buried." The image, which showed Red Cross workers handling body bags, was taken in the aftermath of violence following a prison break in the the Congolese city of Goma, about 2,000 miles from South Africa. The image was a screen capture of a YouTube video that had been posted to a fringe right-wing blog.


Trump receives a daily briefing from 18 intelligence agencies, none of which rely on out-of-context blog photos posted by American civilians watching YouTube. It's not clear who gave Trump his "intelligence" today, or how much of it he actually believes.

Trump seems to have been trying to reprise his February ambush of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, doing a sort of insult-comic roast for the benefit of domestic audiences. But Ramaphosa was ready for it and fired back, at one point openly mocking Trump's acceptance of an extorted bribe from Qatar: "I'm sorry I don't have a plane to give you."

Trump, apparently not realizing he was being made fun of, replied earnestly, "I'd take it. If your country offered the US Air Force a plane, I would take it."

Why does this matter?

  • If Trump knows better but is lying about genocide because he was told to, then he's not morally fit to serve.
  • If Trump isn't lying, but simply accepting easily disproved conspiracy theories because he was told to, then he's not mentally fit to serve.

Tuesday, May 20, 2025

What did Donald Trump do today?

He told Republicans not to "fuck around" with Medicaid, by which he means more than he's already trying to.

Trump is facing a familiar problem from his first term this week: a fight with his own party over the federal budget. With a razor-thin majority in the House and a number of Republican senators who are not politically dependent on him, Trump's budget asks are facing skepticism and scorn from all sides—and that's just inside the GOP. Democrats are rallying around opposing cuts to Medicaid, which provides health care and support for the most vulnerable Americans. 

Medicaid, like Social Security and other so-called "entitlement" programs, has long been in Trump's crosshairs, but the fact that Americans overwhelmingly oppose cuts to them has made them a non-starter even when Trump's party has controlled both houses of Congress.

Today, in a meeting on Capitol Hill with Republican party leaders, Trump made the usual demands for loyalty to him and threats for those who opposed his "big, beautiful bill," whether out of principle or political calculation. But he also tried to retreat to a more politically mainstream position on Medicaid, warning House Republicans not to "fuck around" with the popular program.

The problem there is that Trump's own budget proposal "fucks around" with Medicaid to the tune of almost a trillion dollars: $880 billion, by one estimate. This would kick 10.3 million Americans out of coverage—by definition, Americans who could not afford critical health care or disability support by other means. 

About 80 million Americans receive health care services through Medicaid. Even those who didn't lose care entirely would be affected by Trump's proposed cuts. So would people who are not on the Medicaid rolls themselves, but who provide home care themselves for elderly or disabled relatives and receive reimbursement, which is almost always much cheaper and effective than forcing patients into group care facilities. (Group care facilities will also be affected by Trump's proposed cuts.)

The few Republicans in Congress who want to "fuck around" with Medicaid even more are mostly doing so by proposing work requirements. By definition, most of the people who need Medicaid assistance are already unemployed and/or too sick or disabled to work, and most of the proposed "requirements" take that into account—so this is generally seen as an attempt to deny qualifying Americans through bureaucratic delays.

But it's not clear why Trump is telling those Congressional Republicans not to "fuck around" with Medicaid that way, since he's in favor of putting those barriers in place too, and said so as recently as yesterday.

Why does this matter?

  • Presidents who don't want to fuck around with Medicaid should start by not fucking around with Medicaid.
  • It is not Congressional Republicans' fault that Trump's own ideas are toxic with American voters.

Monday, May 19, 2025

What did Donald Trump do today?

He told a four trillion-dollar lie (through a spokesperson).

Trump has been encountering stiff resistance in getting his budget bill through Congress, and not only because Democrats oppose its massive cuts to Medicaid. Deficit hawks in both parties are alarmed that the proposed budget not only slashes services and effectively raises taxes on low-income households, but balloons the federal debt by giving away trillions of dollars in tax cuts skewed towards the extremely wealthy


The bill couldn't even get through the Republican-controlled House Budget Committee on its first try because of those concerns. That led to the following exchange at a White House press briefing today:

REPORTER: Is the president okay with this bill adding to the deficit?

WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY KAROLINA LEAVITT: This bill does not add to the deficit. In fact, according to the Council of Economic Advisors, this bill will save 1.6 trillion dollars, and the President absolutely hears and understands the concerns of fiscal conservatives who want to get our fiscal house in order, that's what the intention of this bill is. There's 1.6 trillion dollars worth of savings in this bill, that's the largest savings for any legislation that has ever passed Capitol Hill in our nation's history.

In reality, the bill as written will add to the deficit, by about $4 trillion dollars

That means that more than ten percent of the money the government has ever borrowed will be necessary to fund the tax cuts for this one budget. The "savings" Leavitt mentioned are overwhelmed by the massive decrease in revenue, meaning the government will be forced to borrow more money in order to pay its day-to-day bills.

The bill itself contains language increasing the debt ceiling to allow that very borrowing.

In other words, Trump's spin is like saying that a business with $1.4 million in revenue and $5.4 in debts is profitable. That's not an unusual approach for Trump to take in his own business career, but the United States government can't declare bankruptcy.

Why does this matter?

  • There are lies, and then there are lies that cost about $4,000,000,000,000.

Sunday, May 18, 2025

What did Donald Trump do today?

He forgot to tell Vladimir Putin that he'd already declared their phone call tomorrow "successful."

On Saturday, Trump announced that he would be speaking with Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Trump has been trying in vain to broker a ceasefire between the two, largely by demanding that Ukraine concede to Russia even more than the Putin regime has been able to win on the battlefield. But neither country is especially interested in peace on Trump's terms or timetable, something that has confused and frustrated him.

In fact, Russia's response to Trump's attempts to intervene has been more insulting than engaging. It sent only a low-level delegation to a Trump-brokered meeting in Turkey last week, after Putin had initially agreed to attend personally. It was a diplomatic snub that observers agreed was meant to send the message that Russia is not worried about Trump.

(Trump is deeply financially entangled with the Putin regime, and sought and received help from Russia during the 2016 election. His first impeachment was over his attempts to blackmail Ukraine into making false accusations against his likely 2020 opponent Joe Biden.)

Today, Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, announced in advance that the call would be "successful." Witkoff, like Trump, is an enthusiastic admirer of Putin, but has no diplomatic experience or special knowledge of the conflict, and did not elaborate.

Apparently unaware that Monday's call had already been deemed "successful" in getting the Putin regime to start de-escalating, Russia launched the largest single drone barrage against Ukraine since the start of the war in 2022.

Why does this matter?

  • It's a problem if hostile foreign regimes don't fear or respect the President of the United States.
  • It's a big problem if they act like they don't.
  • It's an enormous problem if they don't really have any reason to.

Saturday, May 17, 2025

What did Donald Trump do today?

He got a little confused about how businesses make money.

Wal-Mart, the nation's largest retailer, announced earlier this week that they would be raising prices to cover the cost of the tariffs Trump has imposed since returning to office. Its CFO told the Associated Press that "there’s a limit to what we can bear, or any retailer for that matter."

Wal-Mart's announcement was unusual: normally, companies try not to call attention to price increases. But given that the cause was beyond their control, Wal-Mart seems to be hoping that its customers will understand it's not to blame for the spike in prices and reduced options caused by the new tariffs. 

Trump responded today by demanding that Wal-Mart and other American retailers simply absorb the costs themselves, without raising prices.

Walmart should STOP trying to blame Tariffs as the reason for raising prices throughout the chain. Walmart made BILLIONS OF DOLLARS last year, far more than expected. Between Walmart and China they should, as is said, “EAT THE TARIFFS,” and not charge valued customers ANYTHING. I’ll be watching, and so will your customers!!!

Trump, who cheated on his taxes and never really had to worry about whether he turned a profit on the real estate empire he inherited, may be a little hazy on capitalism as it's experienced by most Americans. But businesses always pass on big unexpected costs to consumers—or they go out of business. Wal-Mart is many things, but it is not a charity.

As everyone from economists to social media users were quick to note, there are a few other problems with this. For one, Trump has always claimed that foreign countries pay tariffs. This is, to put it mildly, completely false. But if Trump's version of things were true, and foreign governments or manufacturers were absorbing the costs of the tariffs through lower prices, there would be no expenses for Wal-Mart and every other retailer to pass on in the first place. 

Trump also claims, sometimes in the same breath, that tariffs will revitalize American manufacturing by making it cheaper to buy products made in the United States. That's true—because tariffs make foreign goods more expensive for consumers.

In other words, Trump is saying that Wal-Mart and other businesses should "eat" a tax that isn't even supposed to exist, and if it did (which it does), wouldn't accomplish anything unless it were passed on to consumers.

Why does this matter?

  • Even by Trump's standards, this is an embarrassing failure to understand a simple concept.

Friday, May 16, 2025

What did Donald Trump do today?

He had some thoughts on popular music.

Trump made two forays into the world of music criticism today. One was to declare that Taylor Swift, a mega-star less than half his age he's tried to start drama with in the past, was no longer "hot"—because he said so.

Taylor Swift performs onstage for the opening night of Taylor Swift | The Eras Tour at State Farm Stadium on March 17...
Taylor Swift on the 2024 Eras Tour, the highest-grossing and highest-revenue concert tour of all time.

The other was to threaten Bruce Springsteen (who, at 75, is still four years younger than Trump) for criticizing Trump at a concert in Manchester, UK on Wednesday. The legendary rocker said that Trump's administration was "corrupt, incompetent and treasonous." Trump responded by suggesting that Springsteen might have trouble returning to the United States if he didn't "KEEP HIS MOUTH SHUT."

Trump also called Springsteen "dumb as a rock" and critiqued the condition of his skin.

It's not uncommon for Trump to spend the presidential workday riffing about pop culture on social media. But Springsteen and Swift weren't the only musicians on his mind today. Rolling Stone reported today that friends of the rapper Sean Combs, also known as Puff Daddy and P-Diddy, have been working Trump for months to get him to grant a pardon. Combs is on trial in federal court for sex trafficking and racketeering.

While Diddy isn't Trump's favorite rapper—that would be Kanye West—he does have a good chance at a Trump pardon, based on Trump's history. Combs is a celebrity in a high-profile trial, and more importantly his alleged offenses (running a criminal organization and sex crimes) are similar to ones Trump himself is known or generally suspected of having committed. A great many of Trump's pardons fit that exact pattern.

In fact, Combs is such a natural fit for a Trump pardon that it was first "reported" three days ago, in the satirical newspaper The Onion.



Why does this matter?

  • There are probably more important things for the President of the United States to be thinking about than how much he hates popular musicians.
  • Saying mean things about popular people to get attention is immature even by 7th-grade standards.
  • It's bad if satire of you reliably comes true.

Thursday, May 15, 2025

What did Donald Trump do today?

He reminded the United States military exactly how much he respects them.

Trump addressed American servicemembers at an Air Force base in Qatar today, in what amounted to a campaign speech. There were three overarching themes of his remarks. First, that he had been elected President three times (not two) and should be elected to a "fourth." Second, that the senior command of the American military was incompetent and that "his" military successes were all down to his personal skill, not the "bunch of frickin' losers" and "fake generals" who actually serve in the military chain of command.

The third was an announcement of a 3.8% cost-of-living raise for most servicemembers, which he painted as a personal favor from him. These raises are essentially automatic, and the one Trump is proposing is the smallest in four years.

Trump has a long and contentious history with the American military. Like many wealthy young men of his generation, he dodged the Vietnam draft—at first legally via student exemptions, and then with a miraculous last-minute diagnosis of disqualifying "bone spurs" on his heels from a doctor whose landlord was Trump's father

But he also seems to harbor genuine anger at those who serve, both officers and enlisted personnel. He's expressed disdain and bewilderment at the concept of sacrifice, reportedly calling dead American soldiers "suckers" and "losers." On Memorial Day in 2017—the day that Americans remember their fallen military—Trump stood by the grave of Lt. Robert Kelly, the son of his chief of staff, Gen. John Kelly, and said, "I don't get it. What was in it for them?" Robert was killed on patrol in Afghanistan in 2010. He's treated phone calls to the families of servicemembers killed in operations he ordered as nuisances—when he can be bothered to do them at all.

The American military has, since the Civil War, been the envy of the free world for its fierce commitment to the rule of law and subordination to the lawful political order decreed by the Constitution. Its officers swear an oath of loyalty and obedience not to the president or the government, but to the Constitution itself. This may be why Trump seems to regard American officers, who have had plenty of occasions to choose between loyalty to Trump personally and to the rule of law, as a personal threat to him. That much explains his attempt to purge the senior leadership of the military who rose to their commands without his personal help.

The feeling is mutual, to a surprising degree. Servicemembers often lean more politically conservative than Americans on the whole—but Trump was underwater with them in polls during his first term. Officers who served on Trump's White House staff during his first term are nearly unanimous in their disgust for Trump: his former Joint Chiefs chair, Gen. Mark Milley, called him a "fascist to the core." Milley had been put in the incredible situation, on January 6th, of having to reassure his counterparts in China that Trump would not be able to seize power or order a suicidal nuclear attack as a distraction.

Trump responded by calling for Milley to be executed for treason.

Why does this matter?

  • Only wannabe dictators need armies personally loyal to them and not the countries they're supposed to serve.
  • No matter how many times he says otherwise, Trump does not know "more than the generals" about anything having to do with military matters.
  • No one who can't show basic respect for American servicemembers is fit to be their commander-in-chief.

Wednesday, May 14, 2025

What did Donald Trump do today?

He dodged a lot of stories about antisemitism in his administration and his biggest fans.

Today, Trump lost a round in one of many ongoing court battles related to his attempts to deport academics with valid visas for supposed "antisemitism." Badar Khan Suri, an Indian citizen legally in the country to work as a postdoctoral fellow at Georgetown University, was ordered released from detention today. He took part in a protest last year against the treatment of Palestinians by Israel—before Trump even took office—and is married to a Palestinian-American citizen.

Trump has characterized any protest against the government of Israel as being "pro-Hamas" and "antisemitic," and has not hesitated to label anyone he regards as an enemy that way, including Jews. He has also argued that this is in and of itself grounds for deportation—or, in other words, that the government is entitled to punish law-abiding immigrants for political speech its president doesn't like. But as a matter of centuries-old law, the First Amendment protects all people, not just citizens. This was the basis for the order freeing Khan Suri.

This wasn't the only time today the question of antisemitism came up. NPR released a report today on three high-ranking Trump administration officials with ties to violent actual antisemitic extremists. (As the report noted, this is in addition to officials whose close ties to anti-Jewish extremists was already known, like FBI Director Kash Patel.)

Neither Trump nor his administration responded to NPR's requests for comment.

A second story about actual anti-Jewish sentiment broke today as more details are emerging about the 59 white South African "refugees" that Trump recently brought to the United States. Charl Kleinhaus, a white farmer who now lives in Buffalo, tweeted this in 2023:

 

Charl Kleinhaus
@charlkleinhaus
Jews are untrustworthy and a dangerous group they are not Gods chosen like to believe they are . Where is the Temple that must be their concern leave us alone we all believe in the God of Abraham , Moses and Jacob ! I almost said something ugly … 🤐


By Trump's standards as applied to any other group living legally in the United States, this would be grounds for immediate detention and deportation. Kleinhaus' social media accounts make clear he's a fan of antisemitic podcaster Stew Peters—whose show FBI Director Patel appeared on eight times, even though he said he couldn't remember who Peters was during his confirmation hearing.

Neither Trump nor the White House has commented on Kleinhaus, either.

By his own admission, Trump believes any number of anti-Jewish stereotypes. He called American Jews who oppose the Netanyahu government in Israel "disloyal." (The idea that Jews are only loyal to themselves or Israel rather than the countries in which they live was one of the animating ideas behind the Holocaust; Trump's only twist on it is that he thinks it should be true.) 

Trump has said that Jews who didn't vote for him "hate their religion." He's perpetuated antisemitic stereotypes about Jews and money. He told a Jewish audience at the Israeli American Council that they were "brutal killers, not nice people at all" in business because of their supposed lust for money, and taunted them by saying it would force them to vote for him even though they hated him.

Trump weaponizing claims of antisemitism are a recent development, though. More typically, he's viewed anti-Jewish extremists as his base and defended them as "very fine people."

Why does this matter?

  • Antisemitism is a genuine threat to Jews all over the world and needs to be treated like a problem, not a political opportunity.
  • It's bad if the President of the United States believes disgusting racist stereotypes about Jews.
  • It's worse if he goes out of his way to surround himself with staff who feel the same way.
  • The Constitution, not Donald Trump's feelings, is the supreme law of the United States.

Tuesday, May 13, 2025

What did Donald Trump do today?

He couldn't get away from the subject of his $400M "gift" plane.

Trump is on a three-country tour of the Middle East this week, visiting Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. His family's wealth is deeply enmeshed with the ruling monarchies of all three of these countries. For example, Saudi Arabia gave billions of dollars to Trump's son-in-law's private equity firm even though their own analysis showed that it was probably a bad investment. (Once Trump was re-elected, other Gulf states, including Qatar, ponied up money for it as well.) And the UAE has, in recent weeks, been throwing money at several Trump business ventures, including real estate and cryptocurrencies.

In return, Trump has made a number of policy and diplomatic concessions to the rulers of these Gulf states, including ending sanctions on Syria and lavishly praising the de facto ruler of Saudi Arabia, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. MBS, as he is known, orchestrated the murder of a Saudi-American journalist, Jamal Khashoggi, during Trump's first term. The brutal murder of Khashoggi was international news for months, forcing Trump—who was financially entangled with the Saudi royal family then, too—to pretend he didn't know that American intelligence agencies had definitively linked the murder to MBS. 

Today, in his remarks about MBS, Trump gushed, "I like him a lot. I like him too much. That's why we give so much, you know? Too much. I like you too much."

But the main symbol of Trump's willingness to sell access to him and to the levers of American power for this week remains the $400M ultra-luxury jet that the Qatari ruling family wants to gift him. 

Trump has insisted it's not really "for" him because it would be donated to his presidential library after he left office, but only he or his heirs would ever have control over its use, making it his property in all but the most technical sense. He's insisted that it's "free," although inspecting and retrofitting it to the military standards necessary for a plane carrying the president will cost far more than the plane is worth in its current form.

Trump has always been intensely emotional on the subject of the planes he uses almost every week to shuttle between his various resorts, particularly with respect to the age of the current Air Force One. Its airframe is, as Trump bitterly complains about, some 40 years old. But it is, in every conceivable sense, a far "newer" plane than most Americans will ever see. Trump spent a great deal of time during his first term trying unsuccessfully to finagle a new plane on a faster schedule—or at least a new paint scheme

Pressed yet again on the matter today, Trump resorted to one of the few subjects where he has bona fide knowledge: golf

There was an old golfer named Sam Snead, did ever hear of him? He was a great golfer, he won 82 tournaments, and he had a motto: When they give you a putt, you pick up your ball, say "thank you very much" and walk to the next hole. A lot of people are stupid. They say "no, no, I insist on putting it." Then they putt it, they miss it. And their partner gets angry at them. You know what, remember that. Sam Snead. When they give you a putt, you pick it up, you walk to the next hole and say "thank you very much."

Trump is referring to the golf custom known as a "gimme," where in friendly no-stakes games, very short putts are treated as having been made without the player having to actually take a stroke or sink the putt. Of course, in the actual sport, which takes its rules so seriously that many infractions result in disqualification even if there was no ill intent on the part of the player, this is completely forbidden.

The United States Constitution, which are the rules of the game for Trump as president, explicitly forbids the president or any other officer to receive any "present" from any "king, prince, or foreign state" without explicit approval from Congress. 

Incidentally, for a man whose cognitive function is regularly called into question, Trump's recollection of Snead's record is accurate: he did, in fact, win exactly 82 PGA tournaments. However, in an interview on board the present Air Force One today, Trump couldn't recall the name or title of the person trying to give him the new plane.

Why does this matter?

  • Open, naked corruption is still corruption.
  • Nobody who becomes emotionally distraught because one of the most advanced, luxurious planes in the world simply isn't good enough is fit to serve as president.
  • No matter how much a president may like kings, the President of the United States is not a king.

Monday, May 12, 2025

What did Donald Trump do today?

He got ready to deport Afghans who helped the United States while welcoming exclusively white "refugees" from South Africa.

The Trump administration conducted a gaudy welcome ceremony for 59 citizens of South Africa, all of them white, declaring them "refugees" from a non-existent "genocide." In reality, some white landowners whose ownership of farms has its roots in decades of apartheid-era oppression of Black South Africas are upset by a new law which allows the government to seize unused or underused land for public development. (The United States and virtually every other country has a similar legal process, generally known as eminent domain.) 

Little if any land has been seized from white farmers under the law, and none without compensation. Trump has referred to this as a "genocide," a characterization that white South Africans themselves overwhelmingly reject.

Trump, who falsely assumes Congressional districts with Black representatives are "crime-infested" and who railed against "shithole countries" with Black- or Latino-majority populations, insisted that race was not a factor in remarks today. He then immediately followed that statement by saying that he had offered refugee status exclusively to the white Afrikaner minority because "white farmers" were being killed. In reality, three times as many Black South Africans were killed on farms in recent years.

A State Department spokesperson later made the subtext even clearer, saying that white South Africans were being favored over people in actual danger because, apparently unlike refugees from almost any other group, they "could be assimilated easily."

Trump has shut down virtually every other refugee assistance program while openly courting the white Afrikaner population, apparently at the instruction of his political patron Elon Musk, whose family fortune also has its roots in apartheid. 

As of today, that includes protection from deportations for Afghan citizens who aided the United States during its decades-long war in that country. The current Taliban-dominated government of Afghanistan is very likely to persecute refugees deported from the United States. The Trump administration's official line is that Afghanistan is now "peaceful."

Why does this matter?

  • The only reason to make a public show of welcoming wealthy white "refugees" in no actual danger is to make a mockery of people who actually need help.
  •  Betraying allies who sacrificed their lives and family members for the United States may common under Trump, but it's still evil. 

Sunday, May 11, 2025

What did Donald Trump do today?

He defended taking the largest single bribe of his presidency so far.

ABC News is reporting today that Trump will accept the gift of a luxuriously appointed jet from the government of Qatar for use as his official plane while in office, and then as a "donation" to his presidential library, which Trump will controls. Trump will therefore have exclusive use of the jet referred to as a "flying palace" for the rest of his life.

ABC is reporting that the Justice Department has been preparing the way with legal arguments claiming that he can accept what is transparently a bribe by the Qatari monarchy. Bribery, especially by foreign countries, is explicitly prohibited by the Constitution in two separate places, and is one of the few specific offenses mentioned as grounds for an impeachment.

The Trump White House dodged comment for most of the day, but late in the evening Trump took to his private microblogging site to try to defend it:

So the fact that the Defense Department is getting a GIFT, FREE OF CHARGE, of a 747 aircraft to replace the 40 year old Air Force One, temporarily, in a very public and transparent transaction, so bothers the Crooked Democrats that they insist we pay, TOP DOLLAR, for the plane. Anybody can do that! The Dems are World Class Losers!!! MAGA

Another word for "GIFT, FREE OF CHARGE" is "present." Article I, Section 9 of the United States Constitution says that no officer of the United States "shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State." Neither bribery nor the receipt of an unconstitutional "present" from a foreign king is less illegal for being done in the open.

Trump's claim that it's only Democrats who are upset about this isn't true either: some of the most pointed criticism has come from his closest ultra-right-wing allies.

Since taking office, Trump has made no real attempt to hide how he personally profits from the presidency. This has ranged from overcharging the Secret Service for the rooms and office space it rents from him so that it can protect him, to acting as his own landlord when his business leased space owned by the federal government, to his pump-and-dump schemes for the Trump-branded memecoin he uses to sell access to himself.

He's also no stranger to using non-profit organizations to pay for his own personal expenses. One of the details revealed by Pulitzer Prize-winning reporting by David Farenthold in 2016 was that Trump had used his "charity," the Trump Foundation, to pay for his own bills as minor as a $7 fee for his son's membership in the Boy Scouts. The Trump Foundation was later dissolved by a New York state court for its illegal use of the funds that, for the most part, other people had donated.

One of the crimes committed by Trump's fraudulent charity was an illegal political donation to Pam Bondi, who later became Trump's personal defense attorney and is now his Attorney General. That illegal donation appears to have been a successful bribe, as Bondi—who was then Florida's Attorney General, inexplicably opted Florida out of a multistate lawsuit against Trump's fake school, Trump University. 

Bondi, who reportedly authored the memo giving Trump legal cover to accept the Qatari plane, has also worked as a lobbyist for Qatar.

Why does this matter?

  • Whoring out the presidency is still bad even if you've gotten away with it before.
  • Flaunting how corrupt you are to show how you're above the law is what tinpot dictators do.