Friday, June 12, 2026

What did Donald Trump do today?

He got Americans excited about watching scaffolding go up in the middle of the night, among other arts news.

Trump's name was ordered to be physically removed from the facade of the John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts, the capitol-area institution that he tried to rebrand after himself. Since returning to office, Trump purged the Kennedy Center's board, stocked it with personal loyalists, installed himself as the emcee of its awards ceremony, cancelled or drove away most of the artists scheduled to perform there, and tried to turn it into a culture-war battlefield. He also had his name installed above Kennedy's.

But only an act of Congress can rename the Center, and even with a Republican majority in both houses for the moment, there is very little appetite in Trump's party to indulge in his obsession with using the power of his office for self-promotion. Federal courts struck down the move, and last week Trump appeared to acquiesce, sort of. He issued a sulky social media post saying that if he couldn't have it named for himself, he'd "transfer" the Center back to Congress's control, which is legally meaningless.

 


 

But late yesterday, at the very last minute, Trump made one last-ditch attempt, in the form of a motion for an emergency stay of a judge's order to chisel his name off the building. In it, his loyalists on the Board claimed to have rewritten their own bylaws to cripple the Center's fundraising arm if and only if Trump's name was removed from the building.

 

In other words, Trump had his political appointees put a poison-pill provision in the Center's own governing documents designed to hurt it financially if a judge tried to enforce the law.

The motion was promptly denied.

Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands of people tuned into livestreams of the Kennedy Center's facade all day in anticipation of Trump's name being taken down. Scaffolding slowly went up over the course of the day, delayed for a while by lightning in the area. By midnight EST, Trump's name was still up, but workers continued preparations as raucous crowds chanted "bring it down."

Trump's loyalists on the Kennedy Center board are also being sued for a more traditionally Trump-like reason: they're accused of trying to steal funds from a non-profit organization, the Washington National Opera. (Trump's own "charity" was dissolved by the State of New York when he was found to be using it as a personal slush fund, vehicle for tax evasion, and as a way of making illegal campaign donations.)

The WNO's suit alleges that, after years of mutually beneficial partnership, the Center's board illegally used the WNO's endowment as collateral for its own loans. Then, when the WNO decided to end the partnership, the Center's board seized donations it had been managing for the opera. It also "cut off the opera’s access to its emails, donor records and board minutes dating to 2011; locked staff out of their offices; sent termination letters to WNO employees; and scrubbed the opera’s remaining season from the center’s website."

Why does this matter?

  • This is the kind of destructive, self-centered behavior that would have parents worried if a four-year did it, much less a sitting President of the United States. 
  • There's a term for striking down monuments to self-glorifying dictators—damnatio memoriae—and all things considered, given how dictators usually meet their ends, it's the moderate response. 

Thursday, June 11, 2026

What did Donald Trump do today?

He repeated his Iran spin cycle for at least the 39th time.

Today was still yet another day of rapid-cycling on Iran for Trump. He began the day by promising to conduct massive attacks by evening, including an invasion of Iran's oil facilities on Kharg Island. He backed away from that by implying that Americans were too cowardly to see that kind of invasion through—or, at least, Americans besides himself.

But by midday, Trump was once again declaring that a peace agreement was a done deal.

If all this sounds familiar, it's because Trump has done both of these things—swear utter destruction and promise a peace deal that is always just around the corner—on virtually every day of the 104 days since he launched the war, often on the very same day. This is at least the 39th separate time that Trump has promised that a peace agreement is only days away.

With only Trump's word to go on, there's no particular reason to believe this time is any different. Iran has said that no such agreement has been finalized, and Israel—which Iran has said must agree to halt its attacks on Lebanon as a precondition for any further negotiations—has said it's not a party to any deal at all. 

It's worth noting that Iran isn't even pretending to negotiate for an end to the war. Rather, what Trump is claiming for the 39th time is that Iran will sign a memorandum of understanding about the basis for actual peace talks. Trump desperately needs something he can sell as progress in the disastrous Iran campaign, for both political and economic reasons. 

Or, as one news summary put it:

Qatari Amiri Diwan: President Trump confirmed the continuation of efforts to complete the final procedures in preparation for announcing the arrangements regarding the signing of the agreement

— Shipwreck (@shipwreck75.bsky.social) June 11, 2026 at 2:20 PM

Trump also declared the Strait of Hormuz was open—a completely absurd claim that he's made before, and for good measure also said it had been open for a month.

Trump: "The strait is open. But the straits have been open for a number of months already and you just didn't know about it."

[image or embed]

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) June 11, 2026 at 3:09 PM

It is not and has not been




 

Why does this matter?

  • The safety, security, and prosperity of the United States is infinitely more important than Donald Trump's ego.  
  • Lies don't become true just because you repeat them 39 times or more.  
  • It's not clear who Trump thinks he's fooling at this point, unless it's himself.

Wednesday, June 10, 2026

What did Donald Trump do today?

He said he "loved" consumer prices going through the roof.

 

The basis of Trump's tariff policy in both terms has been his mistaken belief that when one country has a trade deficit with another—meaning it sells fewer goods and services than it buys—it is somehow "losing" or being "ripped off." In reality, for a wealthy country, moderate trade deficits are normal. Deficits in specific industries can be warning signs, but for the economy as a whole, they aren't usually an indicator of anything more than a country having the money to import the things it needs.

That false belief has driven Trump to try to drastically reduce the trade deficit with the United States' trading partners by imposing enormous tariffs based, in part, on the magnitude of the deficit with individual companies. Tariffs are taxes on imports that increase the price for consumers. 

Targeted tariffs can help steer buyers to domestic products, lessening a deficit. But that deficit-reduction only works to a certain extent, and only if there is a domestic industry ready to take on the excess demand. Trump's trade wars against (for all practical purposes) the entire world at once left consumers with no alternative but to pay the increased price on imported goods, while domestic prices rose too because of the inflationary effect.

More proof of that inflation came today, with the release of a government report showing year-on-year inflation at 4.2%. That's more than twice as high as the 2% inflation that economists believe is a healthy target.

Trump was asked about that troubling number today:

Q: Are you concerned, Mr. President, about the latest inflation numbers that came out this morning?

TRUMP: No, I love it. The, the numbers were great.

Trump's response on the deficit has also been backwards, even by his own generally confused understanding of trade policy. Yesterday, he posted a headline "bragging" that the US trade deficit had increased to record levels.


It wasn't even a recent occurrence: that link went to a Reuters article from January of this year

In other words, Trump spent more than a year trying to drive down the deficit in the mistaken belief that it was money that the United States was "losing," only to forget that and claim that a spike in trade deficits was a good thing. 

Why does this matter?

  • Presidents who can't keep straight whether high inflation is good or bad aren't mentally competent for the job. 

Tuesday, June 9, 2026

What did Donald Trump do today?

He simultaneously predicted peace with Iran (for the 38th time) and tried to get revenge against it.

Just after noon today, Trump issued a statement blaming Iran for the crash of an Apache helicopter off the coast of Oman, claiming that it was Iranian fire that shot down the "highly sophisticated" aircraft. (Both crewmembers were recovered safely.)

Initially, Trump had downplayed the incident, claiming that the fact that the pilots were unhurt meant that Iran downing an American helicopter "wasn't a big deal." This isn't the first time Trump has tried to shrug off actual threats in the hopes of maintaining the illusion of peace with Iran: in 2025, after Iran bombed a US base in Kuwait, Trump absurdly claimed he'd given his permission for the attack. 

 

Of course, the actual United States military tends to regard lethal-force attacks against American servicemembers as a very big deal, and by noon Trump had changed his mind, saying that that the United States "must respond" to the loss of the Apache. By this evening, the United States had carried out strikes on 20 targets, according to an administration official. Iran also retaliated, launching drones at US bases in Bahrain, Kuwait, and Jordan.

But even as the United States and Iran traded attacks in real time, Trump still ruled out ending the "ceasefire" he unilaterally declared in early April. Or, rather, he's ruled out acknowledging that, with all parties to the conflict exchanging attacks, the ceasefire is already over.

The reason for that bizarre contradiction appears to be that today is Tuesday, the midpoint of the three-day period that Trump predicted on Sunday would see Iran agree to a framework for peace negotiations. Even after the news of the Apache crash, early this morning, Trump was still insisting that he was "two or three days away" from a deal, meaning a signed memorandum of understanding for how to talk about an actual peace agreement.

That latest claim is at least the thirty-eighth separate time that Trump has predicted the imminent end of the war since it began 102 days ago. 

This is the latest iteration of a problem that has plagued Trump since the beginning of his ill-fated war: he can't militarily defeat Iran, he can't outlast a regime he's strengthened by virtue of his attacks, and—most importantly—he's completely incapable of admitting how badly he's blundered

Why does this matter?

  • The safety, security, and prosperity of the United States is infinitely more important than Donald Trump's ego. 
  • Lies don't become true just because you repeat them 38 times or more. 
  • No matter how stupid or ill-advised the war in which they happen, attacks against American forces are something the President of the United States should care about.

Monday, June 8, 2026

What did Donald Trump do today?

He saw a basketball game, disrupting thousands of actual fans inside and outside the arena.

Trump traveled to New York this evening to see the Knicks play the San Antonio Spurs in Game 3 of the NBA finals. It's the first time the Knicks have been in the finals in 27 years, and their stampede through the playoffs has been a major cultural event in the city. 

Trump is not a fan of the sport. He attended at the invitation of the team's owner, James Dolan, who like Trump is an heir to a billion-dollar New York fortune. The sport isn't a fan of him, either: he's routinely picked fights with the sport's predominantly Black superstars, and said that players being allowed to take part in Black Lives Matter protests was "gonna destroy the league." (It did not.)

That lack of respect showed in the reaction he got tonight. He was booed on his way into the arena:

New Yorkers welcome Trump's motorcade with a chorus of BOOS. Lots of great signs too πŸ˜‚

[image or embed]

— TofuNYC 🏳️‍πŸŒˆπŸ—½πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡¬πŸ‡±πŸš«πŸ‘‘πŸ–•πŸ§Š (@groguspeak.bsky.social) June 8, 2026 at 7:12 PM

He was loudly booed during the playing of the National Anthem:

Trump, shown on camera during the national anthem, is booed loudly at MSG

[image or embed]

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) June 8, 2026 at 7:40 PM

 

During the national anthem, President Donald Trump was booed by the Game 3 crowd at MSG.

[image or embed]

— The Athletic (@theathletic.com) June 8, 2026 at 7:47 PM

And in spite of some ticket prices in the arena exceeding $50,000—a substantial fraction of what it would cost to buy access to Trump himself—he was roundly booed each time his face appeared on arena screens. 

Part of the reason for that reaction is simply that Trump is extremely unpopular in New York, where he got about 25% of the vote in 2024, meaning he is less popular in the city of his birth than Kamala Harris is in Wyoming. 

But Trump's visit also added more than two hours of wait time for each attendee. 

 

Worse, Trump's security requirements forced the cancellation of a watch party outside the Garden that thousands of fans were expected to attend. The gathering had been organized and approved by the office of NYC mayor Zohran Mamdani, who was also in attendance—though in a "cheap seat" he bought for himself.

Dolan had tried to deny that the cancellation of the watch party was due to Trump, but the NYPD immediately released a statement confirming that the Secret Service required it due to Trump's visit, and that the watch party would resume during Game 4 when Trump was not present.

Trump's appearance is also crushing the hopes of businesses near the Garden for some windfall profits: only ticketholders were allowed inside a fifteen-block zone, while pedestrian and vehicular traffic was banned. 


San Antonio won by a score of 115-111. It was the Knicks' first loss since April 23. Trump didn't seem very interested in the game he disrupted: in spite of deafening crowd noise, he nodded off for part of it. 

Trump takes a long blink during the NBA Finals

[image or embed]

— MeidasTouch (@meidastouch.com) June 8, 2026 at 9:00 PM

 

Trump left with the game still close in the 4th quarter.

 

Why does this matter?

  • The White House gets ABC.  

Sunday, June 7, 2026

What did Donald Trump do today?

He declared imminent peace for the umpteenth time while every other side fired missiles.

Trump made three claims today regarding the ongoing debacle in Iran. First, that both Israel and Iran were "complicating" matters by launching attacks. Iran launched missiles at Israel, and Israel attacked Lebanon's capital of Beirut. Since ending Israel's war against Lebanon is part of Iran's demands, that means that every major party to the Iran conflict other than the United States was engaged in hostilities during the supposed "ceasefire" Trump unilaterally declared two full months ago.

Trump also said he would order Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu not to counterattack against Iran. Netanyahu promptly ignored Trump and launched missiles at Tehran and other Iranian cities

This shouldn't be surprising, as Netanyahu hasn't responded well in the past to suggestions that Trump is in a position to order him to do anything. During the 2025 Iran-Israel conflict, Trump made a similar demand, then watched impotently as Israeli bombers proceeded to their target anyway, even as he insisted on social media that they were merely delivering a "friendly plane wave."  

The third claim was one Trump now makes almost every week: that an agreement would be reached with Iran soon, perhaps "Monday, Tuesday or Wednesday." This is exactly what he said on June 1, May 25, May 7, and April 17, among many other such claims.

To be clear, the "agreement" under negotiation and that Trump is perpetually saying will be signed soon is not to end the war, or to open the Strait of Hormuz, or accomplish any other specific goal. Instead, it would be about the precise wording of a "memorandum of understanding" about how the actual peace negotiations were to proceed—and, very likely, how much cash Iran could force the United States to release in the short term. 

In other words, the situation in Iran remains very much as it has been for the last 100 days. 



Why does this matter?

  • A ceasefire in which missiles are being launched isn't a ceasefire. 
  • An agreement that is always five minutes away from being signed isn't an agreement. 
  • An ally that has totally different aims in a war isn't an ally. 
  • A competent president would know all this without having to find out the hard way.

Saturday, June 6, 2026

What did Donald Trump do today?

He lied about one golf course while relaxing at another.

Trump spent the anniversary of D-Day as he does virtually every weekend: visiting one of his golf resorts at taxpayer expense. He rarely if ever plays any more, but the game was on his mind today, as he complained on his boutique social media site that Maryland's Democratic governor, Wes Moore, had halted a renovation project for two courses at Joint Base Andrews. The military facility is in Maryland, and its courses are popular with servicemembers and those in the defense community.

Trump said that Moore was "attacking the United States Air Force, and our Military, not a smart thing to do." 

There isn't any obvious reason why the state government would object to the base renovating its golf courses—and it hasn't. A spokesperson for Gov. Moore put it bluntly: "Honestly, we have no idea what Donald Trump is talking about." 

The spokesperson added, "Maryland has not halted this project, has not told Joint Base Andrews to stop work, and has been actively working with the Air Force on the permitting process since they raised it just two weeks ago."

As is often the case when Trump tells an easily disprovable lie like this, it's not clear whether he actually believed what he said—and if so, whether he got confused or imagined the whole thing. The White House's response avoided Trump's claim entirely and simply insisted that "President Trump is a champion-level golfer with an extraordinary eye for detail and design."

Trump, who is so notorious as a golf cheat that an entire book has been written about it, has indeed been declared the winner of a number of "club championships." They are all at courses he owns, and include tournaments he didn't play in
 

Why does this matter?

  • The President of the United States should have more important things to worry about than golf course renovation schedules, even if they weren't imaginary.

Friday, June 5, 2026

What did Donald Trump do today?

He tried to make himself a hero for pardoning a white-collar criminal who got caught trying to cheat pollution rules.

Shortly after concluding a full week following a hospital visit in which he did not appear in front of cameras, Trump gave what amounted to a rally speech today in Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin. Uncharacteristically, he remained sitting the whole time, leading to some speculation that he wasn't able to stand for that long

During the speech, Trump made reference to a man he had supposedly pardoned from a seven-year prison sentence for the crime of "fixing his car." 

There is legitimate debate over the so-called "right to repair" issue. As consumer goods, and especially vehicles, become more complex and computerized, manufacturers are more likely to use software or intellectual property protections to force third-party repair shops to pay a licensing fee for access. This can drive up repair costs and limit what consumers can do with their own property. That appears to be the spotlight that Trump was trying to jump in front of today.

In reality, the man Trump was apparently referring to, Troy Lake, was not in prison for  "seven years" and certainly not for "fixing his car." Lake, the owner of a large truck repair company, was convicted for his role in an interstate conspiracy to disable emissions monitoring on hundreds of heavy-duty commercial trucks so that they'd pass inspections. That gave Lake's co-conspirators, who owned the trucks that Lake disabled monitors for, a huge financial advantage over competitors who followed the law and kept their trucks in compliance with emissions standards. As the Department of Justice noted at the time:

Emissions controls on vehicles are critical to maintaining air quality, and when these controls are disabled, the increase in excess tailpipe pollution is significant. A study of the effects of tampering with these 344 trucks showed that the conspirators in this case collectively caused an illegal increase in pollutants of at least 1,300 tons of excess nitrogen oxides, 30 tons of excess non-methane hydrocarbons, 600 tons of excess carbon monoxide, and 30 tons of excess particulate matter. The World Health Organization has found that diesel exhaust is a carcinogen and causes lung cancer. Diesel exhaust is also associated with asthma and an increased risk of mortality from cardiovascular and respiratory disease. These impacts disproportionately affect low-income communities that tend to be located near highways and other high-traffic areas. 

Lake's actual sentence was for one year, not seven. Trump also seemed confused about other details: he claimed that he'd pardoned Lake one or two weeks ago, but it happened last December. He also blamed the conviction on "the Democrats" but the investigation into Lake and his criminal co-conspirators began in 2018, when Trump was president.

Why does this matter?

  • If Trump had pardoned someone people would actually have sympathized with, he wouldn't have needed to lie about what the criminal had done.

  • Past a certain point, lies get so obvious that they're just another way of telling your audience you think they're stupid.

Thursday, June 4, 2026

What did Donald Trump do today?

He invented an election conspiracy theory that was ridiculous even by his standards.
 
Early this morning, Trump made baseless claims that Democrats in California were somehow "trying to STEAL THE GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA PRIMARY, AND THE MAYOR OF LOS ANGELES, PRIMARY, AWAY FROM TWO GREAT REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES." More ominously, he claimed that the US Attorney in Los Angeles was looking into it, although that office refused to confirm any investigation into what has been a busy but orderly election.

Trump was impeached, and indicted in both federal and state courts, for his part in the criminal conspiracy to illegally keep him in power despite the results of the 2020 presidential election. He did not provide any evidence.

Even by Trump standards, these are bizarre lies. Republican candidates are leading in both of these nonpartisan primaries, where the top two candidates advance to the general election. As of tonight, Republican Steve Hilton has the most votes of any single candidate in the gubernatorial race, and Republican Spencer Pratt is in second place in the LA mayoral primary. In fact, if Democrats were trying to "steal" races in the California primaries, they'd be doing a terrible job of it. Republicans and Democrats will likely each have a candidate in every statewide race, with the possible exception of Insurance Commissioner. 

It's unlikely even Trump believes what he's saying about the California elections. It's true that he's famously emotionally ill-equipped to handle losing: after the results of the election became clear in December 2020, he threw a plate of food against the wall of the White House when his Attorney General refused to take further part in his efforts to cling to power. 

But he's also made clear on many occasions that he doesn't really regard elections as binding, at least not on him, which may explain why he's so willing to tell obvious lies. To this day, Trump still explains away his loss in the November 2020 election by claiming that the January 6th riots were a dirty trick played by the "Biden FBI." Astute readers may note that Trump was president that whole time, and the FBI was led by his appointees (who President Biden retained).

Trump's general strategy, even going back to before he was first elected, has been to undermine the basic concept of elections. He's declared them "rigged" even when he or his party eventually won, spread conspiracy theories about voting by mail even as he does it himself, and invented preposterous stories about literal millions of never-detected "illegal" votes supposedly cast by undocumented immigrants to explain why he lost the popular vote in 2016 to Hillary Clinton. 

Trump didn't mention it in his rant, but there are congressional districts where the runoff will have two Democratic candidates. That's because the districts were drawn up by the California State Assembly to be virtually guaranteed to elect a Democrat. That partisan gerrymandering was done in direct response to Trump's demand that every Republican-led state do the same, and only after several of those states had. 

All told, Republicans are likely to net about 6 seats as a result. That's generally expected to be far too little to prevent an anti-Trump wave in the midterm elections. By way of comparison, Democrats picked up 41 seats in the House of Representatives in 2018, when Trump's net approval rating was -10% at this point in the cycle. As of the latest 2026 polls, it's -25% and dropping fast.

 

Why does this matter?

  • States don't need Donald Trump's permission to hold elections. 
  • There's only one reason a historically unpopular politician would try to undermine public confidence in democracy. 
  • You don't tell lies this obvious unless you think the people listening to you are very, very stupid.

Wednesday, June 3, 2026

What did Donald Trump do today?

He gave himself the power to fire civil servants for telling him things he doesn't want to hear.

Trump went to the hospital last Tuesday for a "physical," after which he did not appear in public or in front of a camera for an entire week. Today, he finally emerged at a signing ceremony, with unexplained facial swelling, appearing both agitated and exhausted.

The occasion was his signing of an executive order that purports to make at least 8,000 senior federal government employees "at-will," meaning that they can be fired for any reason or no reason at all. Under existing laws, politicians need a valid reason like poor performance to fire most federal employees.

Civil service protection laws were put in place to prevent corruption. When government employees, especially those in supervisory positions, can be fired at the whim of a president, then they are more vulnerable to pressure to act in the president's interests rather than the public interest. This isn't a theoretical problem: it was the driving force behind the rampant government corruption of the late 19th century

Trump routinely refuses to acknowledge findings by the federal government that he doesn't like, or that are politically damaging to him, calling them the work of the "deep state," a supposed shadowy conspiracy against him

In effect, Trump's order would give him the power to force government employees to choose between keeping their jobs, or doing their work in an honest and nonpartisan fashion, whenever their duties conflicted with what Trump wanted them to do or say. For example, he could force the Treasury Department to cook the books on critical inflation or unemployment statistics—just like he accused previous administrations of doing

A Trump spokesperson today claimed that all the order was intended to do was make sure that federal employees followed all "lawful" instructions. But there would be nothing strictly illegal about Trump demanding that a government medical researcher issue a report that wind turbines cause cancer, or that household cleaning products could be taken internally to cure COVID. He could force the NIJ, which compiles crime statistics for the federal government, to "find" that undocumented immigrants commit more crimes than native-born citizens, even though the opposite is true.

Trump has gone on a stock-buying spree lately, often in companies that have subsequently announced lucrative government contracts, driving up the value of his investments. He could make government auditors—the exact people whose job it is to prevent waste and fraud—come up with fake "reasons" after the fact that seem to justify those contracts, insulating him against prosecution from corruption after leaving office. He could make research scientists at the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry choose between warning the public about a dangerous chemical made by a company he'd invested in, and losing their jobs.

Or, to take an example from today's headlines, Trump could have simply pressured USDA field agents not to confirm that screwworms, the devastating cattle parasite, had been found in Texas. This would have allowed him to dodge responsibility for needlessly killing the cheap and effective government program that had kept them from spreading northward into the United States. 

It also means that Trump could simply continue his pattern of firing people he suspects for demographic reasons of being "disloyal" to him, as with his purge of female and Black military leaders.

Why does this matter?

  • The federal government owes its allegiance to the American people, not Donald Trump personally.   

Tuesday, June 2, 2026

What did Donald Trump do today?

He put his political hatchet man in charge of the country's intelligence agencies.

Today, Trump named Bill Pulte as his acting Director of National Intelligence. Pulte, who will also continue in his role as head of the Federal Housing Authority, is best known in national circles for his role in ginning up spurious criminal investigations against at Trump's political enemies. (Specifically in Michigan real estate circles, he's known for being the defendant in a class action lawsuit for shoddy construction in the homes built by the company he inherited.)

In simplest terms, Pulte made a list of Trump's enemies, then used his position to go looking through the details of private financial transactions for pretexts to have criminal charges brought against them.

Among Pulte's targets for Trump's revenge were Sen. Adam Schiff (D-CA), former Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA), NY state Attorney General Letitia James, and Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook. Schiff and Swalwell are outspoken critics, and James successfully prosecuted Trump's company for hundreds of millions of dollars in fraud. Cook simply refused to resign from the Federal Reserve Board so that Trump could appoint someone who would give him the massive interest rate cut he wants and would personally make tens or hundreds of millions of dollars from.

None of Pulte's criminal investigations or referrals went anywhere, and at least one was a spectacular failure by legal standards: DOJ prosecutors failed three times in a row to obtain a valid grand jury indictment of James. (Indictments at the federal level are practically a formality; failing three times in a single case may be a record.) 

In large part, Pulte's scheme failed because the supposed "wrongdoing" he accused them of—mostly, claiming different houses as primary residences on different mortgage applications—isn't illegal in the first place, unless it's part of a larger fraud scheme (like the one Trump himself was convicted of in New York state court). In the aftermath, at least three Trump cabinet officials, were revealed to have made similar mortgage claims, and Pulte's multi-millionaire father and stepmother were found to have both claimed homestead tax credits on two properties, which is likely illegal. (Pulte did not bring charges against any of them.)

When federal agents at the FNMA, which Pulte chairs, began investigating whether Pulte had improperly used his influence to target Trump's political enemies, Trump fired them.  

In his new role as DNI, Pulte would have access to all of the most sensitive information known to the United States government. That makes the fact that Pulte does not even have a security clearance now an enormous problem. There is also a legal problem with Pulte's appointment: federal law requires that a DNI have "extensive" experience in national security. Pulte, who at 38 has spent his entire career before 2025 as the heir to a real estate fortune, has none at all.

There was bipartisan disgust at the announcement today. Republican Sen. John Thune said the pick would "weaponize" the national intelligence system against Trump's enemies. The conservative editorial board of the Washington Post marveled that Trump had "managed to find someone less qualified than Tulsi Gabbard to replace her as interim director of national intelligence," and said that Pulte was a "sycophant" whose real function would be to damage the nation's intelligence agencies from within. (Trump has had a vendetta against the American intelligence community from the start, in part because they exposed his campaign's collusion with the Russian government to subvert elections on his behalf.) GOP Senator Bill Cassidy simply called Pulte incompetent.

Trump has been claiming since he took office that he, personally, is the real victim of the "weaponization" of government. 

Why does this matter?

  • Using the law to punish enemies for political crimes is basically the core of authoritarianism. 
  • The person in charge of national intelligence should know the first thing about intelligence, or at least have held a job they didn't inherit from their grandfather.
  • Playing the victim is a classic abuser strategy.

Monday, June 1, 2026

What did Donald Trump do today?

He tried to whistle past the graveyard of his Iran war. 

Trump has spent weeks now trying to reach an agreement with Iran—not to end the war, but to create a preliminary framework to begin discussing the terms that would lead to an end to hostilities. He's been vocally anxious about the possibility that Iran can win more favorable terms simply by letting the current crisis erode his political base. 

The crux of Trump's dilemma is that while he is absolutely indifferent to the damage this is doing to the United States he cannot bear the possibility of having to acknowledge the reality of the shocking and humiliating way the war has unfolded for him. This means that Trump himself has blown up all of the potential avenues for a real settlement, because there is no face-saving way out of the war for him at this point. At the same time, he's announced that a resolution to the conflict is imminent so many times that it was already a punchline a month ago.

Today, even as he once again insisted that a deal (to agree to terms for actual negotiation) was imminent, he tried to act as though he didn't care about the outcome. He told CBNC reporter Eamon Javers that "if [negotiations with Iran] are over, they’re over. If they’re not, you know, I think they took too much time. Frankly, I thought they started to get very boring." He insisted, "I don’t care if they’re over, honestly. I really don’t care. I couldn’t care less."

For good measure, Trump then told Javers that the Strait of Hormuz was, in fact open. It absolutely is not.

It's not actually that hard to believe that Trump really is bored. (He seemed to know that was a possibility in March when he preemptively promised he wouldn't get bored, which isn't something a president would normally have to reassure people about.) 

Trump has been absolutely blunt and outspoken about his lack of interest in the economic crisis this is causing for Americans, saying that when it came to the war, "I don’t think about Americans’ financial situation… not even a little bit." He's taken a similarly cavalier approach to the lives of American servicemembers, noting the initial deaths with a literal shrug and a smirk. And his public relations strategy today was to have the White House put out a graphic of him telling Americans to "sit back and relax" because "it will all work out well in the end."

But then again, he might care a little. He also posted, for the third time in as many weeks, a bitter rant about how if Iran did surrender and admit utter defeat, nobody would give him credit.


Iran has not surrendered or admitted defeat. 

Why does this matter?

  • The fact that Trump is feeling humiliated at having botched the war should be Trump's problem, not Americans'. 
  • If Donald Trump's interest isn't sufficiently piqued by the problems facing the United States, he should find a job that can hold his attention.
  •